Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve5ra@sasktel.net: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

101. Topband: Yikes (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:46:53 -0600
K1N club log is now up. First QSO costs $6.00 USD. That's got to be the most expensive I have seen. Anyone top that one. I am not complaining! Doug "There are some ideas so absurd that only an intell
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00541.html (6,411 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:56:12 -0600
Well the same thing is going on with the Olympics. Steroids are supposedly banned if you get caught. New ways to hid the use of steroids continues. Eventually the use of steroids will be accepted bec
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00630.html (8,587 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: *****SPAM***** Re: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:11:36 -0600
Eddy, Ham Radio is dead, extinct. It has been replaced with Internet Radio. I once held an amateur radio licence; it now belongs in a museum. Some how good things don't last forever. I have had a lot
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00645.html (9,284 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:06:17 -0600
This is a good example of the entitlement crowd attitude. They believe that all the DXCC entities need to be available NOW, no waiting. Reaching the top of the honor roll was long term plan that kept
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00660.html (9,766 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: *****SPAM***** Re: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:17:46 -0600
Don't feel sorry for me. For while it lasted I have had loads of fun, learned a lot, met many new friends, and travelled to places some can only dream of; all because of amateur radio. Yes I agree th
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00661.html (10,617 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:03:32 -0600
Herb, I understand your frustration with your call sign screw ups. I get the same thing from time to time using a VA prefix. I worked North Korea on both 10 and 15m, but the 15m contact was no where
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00663.html (9,940 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:04:05 -0600
Good for you Larry to post this. It is interesting how some folks come up with all sorts of excuses to justify their unethical/immoral thoughts and behavior. The ARRL by fully putting the onus on the
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00702.html (9,675 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Question... (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:05 -0600
I believe I understand what you are saying ... if you can't control it then legalize it. Doug --Original Message-- thrown out a hotel upper storey window. Question: can I link myself via the internet
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00719.html (11,366 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:02:43 -0600
Yes the DXCC award you have earned is yours. But the problem is the publishing of the standings. The cheaters, commercial RHR users, ethical types are all grouped together. If the standings were not
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00726.html (11,633 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:34:36 -0600
Response below ** --Original Message-- Why does publishing the results change anything. Is there a prize for being Honor Roll number 1? ** yes How do you account for all the other dirty contacts on t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00737.html (10,539 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:07:40 -0600
Yes you are probably right that protesting won't change a thing. But should that mean that when something negative like this happens, that voicing an objection is not considered? Should we just shrug
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00742.html (10,617 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: DXCC Program Integrity (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 11:27:59 -0600
Larry I admire your ability to see past the 'smoke and mirrors' and expose the hypocrisy of the ARRL DXCC program. What you have said is true. The ARRL speaks out of both corners of their mouth. Ther
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00015.html (8,780 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: DXCC Program Integrity (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 12:51:16 -0600
Yes you are right don't participate when it is corrupt. But I have been in the DXCC program for a long time ... it would be hard to leave. I guess a main reason for participating is it serves as a ba
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00019.html (8,676 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:46:33 -0600
I can speculate that your mail box would be overflowing and you could retire comfortably especially if you had a 160m station that worked. Sri Tom, I couldn't resist having some fun. Doug --Original
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00023.html (7,368 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Improving low angle reception DX Eng 8 ele Circle RCV Array (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 15:37:41 -0600
Hmmm. I have had excellent success with that DXE 4- quare system. I use my own verticals and the only problem is deer catching the top hat string and bending the vertical. 70 ft baselines seems short
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00025.html (11,674 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:04:04 -0600
I am in complete agreement with Bob and Charlie. The ARRL has dumbed down the DXCC award to the point where it is nearly meaningless. Doug I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I c
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00033.html (13,687 bytes)

117. Topband: The Remote Question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:03:01 -0600
Without inserting politics into the discussion, all one has to do is look at what is going in the world around us and it is clear the ARRL has fallen into the same game plan. Me, me, me and mini me.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00110.html (8,437 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:10:05 -0600
Ahhh, the social justice warriors (SJW) have arrived. What do we do with them? Doug --Original Message-- Hear Hear! Gary KA1J see that structure ... woman) Flying Circus any one? signals SDR simply r
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00151.html (16,259 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: RFI - and lots of it (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:06:01 -0600
My Icom radios come with the power cord fused for both negative and positive. From what you say, I should remove the negative fuse if I install the radios in a vehicle. Now when the radios are at the
/archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00004.html (9,528 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:06:38 -0600
What I often do during a phone contest exchange is omit the signal report and only give out the section, serial number, etc. Very few operators request the signal report and when they do I reply 'my
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00124.html (10,144 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu