Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 293 ]

Total 293 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: from: wycpublic@gmail.com (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:29:54 -0600
This is spam do not click. This guy's account has been compromised. Mike W0MU http://alarmselpaso.com/swimming.php?sense=dn6rrenb8uke77 wycpublic@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topba
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00218.html (6,976 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: Fwd: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:18:10 -0600
Instead of embracing ways to get and keep more people on the air they want to regulate a certificate into the ground just like the Gov't seems to do with everything it touches. Obviously remote ham r
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00048.html (13,551 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:19:43 -0600
While the horse and carriage still exist very few use them. I am sorry you feel badly about ham radio as we have had some very amazing advances....Weak signal programs are amazing. On 7/11/2015 10:09
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00080.html (10,687 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: The Remote question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:04:08 -0600
Well said Dave! On 7/12/2015 10:49 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: The reaction of the DXing community to new technology over the years has been extremely interesting to observe. Some ops are early adopters, a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00095.html (9,976 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: The Remote question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:16:28 -0600
I think much of the issue with RHR is people are bent out of shape that a group of people have jumped on this and appear to be doing quite well. Business must be booming as they are adding new statio
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00097.html (11,905 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: The Remote question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:56:36 -0600
So what is the difference if I build a station for $100,000 or I rent one for whatever it costs? Nothing. I guess the guy that can't climb towers who has to pay someone else to climb it and fix his s
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00104.html (19,420 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: DXCC etc (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:26:38 -0600
If DXCC is destroyed there sure are a ton of people that failed to get that message. The ARRL is in the business of......................................selling awards.................. The Centennia
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00113.html (10,359 bytes)

88. Topband: DXE ARA-2 active antenna issue (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:32:40 -0700
I have a couple of these that appear to have lower output than the others. Has anyone fixed these in the field. Is there a common failure component? I have checked the jumpers so that should not be i
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00148.html (6,598 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: Contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:41:08 -0700
On good propagation years there generally is not enough band to go split. This was a luxury in this contest. I have noticed that sometimes faster is better, you beat the qsb ups and down and sometime
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00164.html (9,870 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: Contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:48:57 -0700
I ran into a number of CQ loops. I figured they went to the head and decided to hold their Freq. Not cool. W0MU Reminds me of a story I have shared perhaps before... it's almost hard to believe this
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00171.html (10,291 bytes)

91. Topband: 160 vertical/L (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:33:41 -0700
I have a full sized 80m vertical and a Top loaded Cushcraft 33ft vertical for 160. The Cushcraft gets out but not great. I was thinking about using an inverted L over the radial field that I use for
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00175.html (7,100 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: 160 vertical/L (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:27:58 -0700
Seems like the consensus is the L. I think I will try that over the radial field of the existing Cushcraft. Having it separate from the 80 also allows me to run two radios at the same time if need. M
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00180.html (10,882 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: Top band from Indian Ocean - 3B9HA (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:22:40 -0700
You were heard very well in to Colorado last night. I did not get home tonight to check. W0MU This is not a DXpedition in its traditional sense but I will try to spend a few hours on the radio every
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00011.html (8,548 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: New use for Noise Canceling box (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 08:21:46 -0700
Has anyone used an ANC-4 to remove electric fence pops? I have not been able to get to the neighbors houses to figure out where the problems is. It is not terrible but get old after a while. I had to
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00019.html (14,444 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: Clean Sweeps in ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:33:40 -0700
Grats! You guys were loud! That would mean more if I was in Europe and not Colorado HI! Great job! On 12/5/2016 3:05 AM, KY7M wrote: The inaugural use of the NA7TB callsign for the 8-Circle 160m ante
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00043.html (34,741 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:44:14 -0700
Shelby, The first night there were still plenty of stations on after 0700. Maybe it was conditions or that is just how this contest works. I was not able to stay awake and figured I would catch up on
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00044.html (7,419 bytes)

97. Topband: Beverage question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:11:22 -0700
I am looking to supplement my RCV arrays with a bi directional Beverage at about 70 degrees. The path is along an existing barb wire fence line. I can run it approx 480 ft. The last 150 ft or so ther
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00054.html (7,289 bytes)

98. Topband: BOG Question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:13:25 -0700
The bog needs to be insulated from ground. I have a bunch of old RG6 cable that I can use. Should I tie the shield and center together or just use the sheild or just use the center or use something e
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00055.html (6,794 bytes)

99. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:55:48 -0700
If you remove the line completely the other guy gets a busted QSO! You put an X in front of the line. Not sure about the exact formatting. remove or unclaim them and that is NOT RIGHT! Point of clari
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00063.html (8,946 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:33:10 -0700
Ok, But in the other case where you said to remove the contact the DX is sure to get a busted qso right? It is in his log but not in the log of the K7? Am I wrong here? If they badly mangle your call
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00073.html (10,506 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
This search system is powered by Namazu