- 1. [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:24:57 -0700
- Most (all?) RTTY contests prohibit operation on 160 meters. Yet, a number of RTTY contesters have asked that it be added. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this topic, pro and con. In particular, I'm
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00322.html (7,253 bytes)
- 2. Topband: FW: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:47:04 -0700
- FYI, my response on the RTTY reflector to a post there... Ed - W0YK -- Ed Muns Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@co
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00006.html (13,260 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: VP8ORK (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:00 -0800
- Wayne, N1WR, asked: They had a good run on 160 into all areas of NA last night. Check the cluster spots for details. Here on the west coast, they peaked around their sunrise. Ed - W0YK ______________
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00163.html (7,339 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: UFOs (score: 1)
- Author: w0yk@msn.com <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 13:20:27 -0700
- , Dutyru yrj7 8 4*S87e*7 yint frommmg myk rVjer**8imrtu zon Wireless Phoneu *Jh _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00041.html (6,496 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu