Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Topband: FairRite Products 2873000202 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:55:58 EST
My experience is based on the use of these cores in receiving antenna applications ( low noise transformer feedback amplifiers ), over the past 9 years I have wound thousands of transformers using tw
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00094.html (8,809 bytes)

122. Re: Topband: mfj 1025 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:34:05 EST
What two of three antennas should I connect to MFJ for best noise nullig ??? Do I need a fourth "noise" antenna ?? (i.e. an external whip) ?? Thanks Federico ik3umt The two which work the best to nul
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00102.html (7,308 bytes)

123. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:57:45 EST
IMO they need to realize that they have wiped out so many DX contacts with their automated qrm generator operation over the years. A more prudent approach for them would be to move up to 1990KHz or s
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00113.html (7,482 bytes)

124. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:44:48 EST
Did I follow that correctly? Or did I miss something? Who was that director? 73 Tom I think you have it Tom.. The Director is N2FF, Frank Fallon. He is otherwise a good guy, a very active ham as oppo
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00117.html (7,730 bytes)

125. Topband: CQ160 SSB C6 Info (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:23:21 EST
I received this from NE1B -- CQ de C6ANM: I will once again be operating at C6ANM in the Bahamas for the CQWW 160 SSB Contest on 24-26 Feb. We should have a good signal from our salt water Quarter Wa
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00126.html (6,616 bytes)

126. Re: Topband: TopBand Beacons (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:11:39 EST
I agree with some of the sentiment about needing to be more active in the 1st place, calling CQ more often, etc. , however, I also think there a receiving beacon is a good idea. A/B tests, tests to s
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00121.html (8,281 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: Testing RX Antennas "Out of Season" (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:02:47 EST
Using the expanded AM BCB to test and optimize your 160M receive antenna is a great idea. I used it at HC8N a few years ago (could receive many USA stations on the NA Beverage). A list of expanded AM
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00130.html (8,487 bytes)

128. Re: Topband: Relays in RX array (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:02:26 EST
K9AY and KD9SV suggested the following: Tyco/OEG OJE-SH series (sealed case, 12 volt) for spdt Omron G2R series (sealed case, 24 volt) for dpdt Gary specifically suggested the Tyco OMI-SH series, spd
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00182.html (8,471 bytes)

129. Re: Topband: Loop discussion (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:34:30 EDT
This current loop antenna discussion has been replayed continuously since the 1920's in both professional and amateur circles, usually with more smoke than light. If you want to know how a loop works
/archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00049.html (7,799 bytes)

130. Re: Topband: K9AY Antenna (score: 1)
Author: w2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:22:40 -0400
For some reason my K9AY lost it's directivity, seems to receiver well in Those corrosion/poor connection issues can be subtle too - i.e. barrel connectors splicing 2 lines together have been a source
/archives//html/Topband/2006-07/msg00062.html (8,374 bytes)

131. Topband: Helical vertical (score: 1)
Author: w2pm@aol.com
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:09:15 -0400
I saw a few posts on here a few weeks ago - one from Herb - describing a helically wound 60ft vertical using the new long fibreglass telescoping pole from Spiderbeam. At a hamfest here there's a guy
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00101.html (7,085 bytes)

132. Topband: Capacity hats - cylinder form (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:09:32 EDT
I was reading in an old 1944 U miliary manual - TM 11 - 314 Antennas and Antenna Systems a good deal of material on top loaded verticals for 1 - 2 mhz. The author writes of several forms of capacity
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00064.html (6,908 bytes)

133. Re: Topband: Wood vs PVC on Loops ect (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:24:56 EDT
Reading about the various loops and other antennas as well I am reading a lot about using PVC as the separator and boom arms. I don't have but one piece of PVC and it is only about 3.5' long. So I wa
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00122.html (7,598 bytes)

134. Re: Topband: September. (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:06:31 EDT
We are about to run into our summer Qrn season but I will be on the band most days between thunderstorms and my Fire Comms duties.I look forward to continuing contacts and will start looking for Euro
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00129.html (7,090 bytes)

135. Re: Topband: Noise Limiter Help (Paul J. Piercey (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:40:37 EDT
There are 2 different issues here - two problems and two types of tools. The AY loop wont help you much for very local crud noise problems - that's where the MFJ 1025 will help. But the nullers WONT
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00141.html (8,184 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: Ground Radials Yet Again (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:29:48 EDT
Wow, that explains a funny effect I was getting the other day on 20m when experimenting with a ground plane!!! I'm not the physics expert here but somehow I don't think this is valid to the point of
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00099.html (8,260 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: Strange QRN (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:00:35 EDT
sounding note on 160 that was cycling every few >>seconds....... then I noticed it was in time with my CELL PHONE CHARGER !!!! most likely the camera charger and others have the same RFI generation..
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00123.html (7,337 bytes)

138. Topband: W1AW 160 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:44:13 EST
Does anyone have an update on W1AW's 1817.50 plans? I just saw a bulletin announcing their Winter sched and they continue to list this frequency despite the fact they announced earlier in the year th
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00192.html (6,630 bytes)

139. Topband: ARRL re 1817.50 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:45:42 EST
I just got a reply back from ARRL. Looks like no QSY planned for 160: Pete, Here is Dave's answer. It appears that, for the present, there is no longer a plan to move. 73......Frank...N2FF.... Hi Fra
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00001.html (8,560 bytes)

140. Re: Topband: MOVE W1AW (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:32:12 EST
their license you would find like ours there is no >operating frequency indicated, therefore lets move them up to >the middle of the band with the other Broadcast Station near >1850 kHz, same the low
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00025.html (7,502 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu