Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

141. Topband: horizontal guying (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:02:17 EST
Does anyone have suggestions or critical commentary on the idea of "guying" a 60 ft alum monopole (with 10 ft dia top hat) using horizontal lines attached to two trees - one on each side of the monop
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00087.html (6,628 bytes)

142. Re: Topband: 160 mtr low signal - CW Pitch (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:37:34 EST
I wonder if this tinitus this is a function of all those years of "diggin em out" with a pair of headphones on???? I also suffer it.. 73 de Bud WOHG (huh?) Im not a physcian but I have done lots of s
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00214.html (8,932 bytes)

143. Re: Topband: Another radial question (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:22:48 EST
Bill: Take down the elevated radials. Having the elevated radials above the radials on the ground will buy you nothing but potential headaches. I have never been a believer in elevated radials. They
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00004.html (7,134 bytes)

144. Re: Topband: Effects of trees (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:22:37 EST
Do I think trees impact the antenna in a negative manner? Sure I do. So do many other things. How much is anyone's guess, but any amount it hurts is certainly meaningless when compared to not having
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00071.html (8,065 bytes)

145. Re: Topband: Telescoping Fiberglass Mast (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:01:15 EST
The "Hot-Stick" I use here on my PUD activities extends from a collapsed length of ~5-feet to about 40-feet. I have no idea how much this assembly costs but recommend you opt for the variety that is
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00105.html (8,723 bytes)

146. Re: Topband: Telescoping Fiberglass Mast (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:24:57 EST
I just got mine, so I can't report on longevity in the California sun and smog yet. BTW, be prepared to spend some money. These things aren't cheap. 73, Mike W4EF...................... I had a 33ft M
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00113.html (8,201 bytes)

147. Re: Topband: Telescoping Fiberglass Mast (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:27:42 EST
This was a good lead. I went to that site and also got some additional info from Henry on the "Extra Heavy duty" poles. Looks very interesting. Thanks for the response to the web site and the inquiry
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00132.html (8,769 bytes)

148. Re: Topband: EU opening (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:30:15 EST
I have not worked any significant DX since the flare... At my sunrise (Michigan) on the 13th I worked JA8ISU on 1815 kc with his signal a solid 2 S units above the noise ... EU last evening local (or
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00177.html (7,063 bytes)

149. Re: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:10:16 EST
I'm pretty much restricted to a maximum height of 40' for any antenna I install on my covenant-restricted lot. I have thought about an inverted L, but I also wonder if I can achieve a greater effecti
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00198.html (7,695 bytes)

150. Re: Topband: Twin Lead (Speaker Wire) Loss? Wireless link?? (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:59:15 EST
Another alternative would be to use the wireless link from the RX antennas hub back to the transceiver. There are some Bluetooth and Wi-Fi devices around. Has anyone implemented that solution? 73 and
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00208.html (6,900 bytes)

151. Re: Topband: LY report Dec 29 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:10:18 EST
Hi, It finally happens... Good condx to NA. 72 USA + 3 VE + OX3PG this night. W7s started at 0400 UTC with K7TJR. N6TR closed the band 20 mins before sunrise at 0620. W7ZQ, W7RH, AE7H, KA7T, W7LR, N7
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00341.html (7,379 bytes)

152. Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:24:39 EST
With elevated radials near earth there can be a dB or more FS reduction when the feedline shield is not decoupled. This says nothing about the unwanted coupling of noise into the antenna, or RF into
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00342.html (8,131 bytes)

153. Re: Topband: Models and the real world (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:21:38 EST
Case in point: when was the last time you saw anything that was truly in-depth, or enticing, in the "Results" paragraph of any antenna article that you've read in the past ten years? It seems that th
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00347.html (8,545 bytes)

154. Re: Topband: Stew Perry Thank-you (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:51:38 EST
Thanks to all the good folk who slowed down when they came back to me so I could more easily copy the grid report. I'm always amazed with the obvious good will and sportsmanship shown by so many in t
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00003.html (6,991 bytes)

155. Re: Topband: MFJ 1025 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:12:46 EST
I would be interested in the types of "noise antenna" used for the MFJ 1025 canceller together with results. Ron N9AU _______________________________________________ Ron - the noise antenna is very c
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00121.html (9,429 bytes)

156. Re: Topband: MFJ 1025 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:58:51 EST
The MFJ-1025 does not have an internal preamp. Some radios, in particular the FT1000MP series, provide an RF OUT and an RF IN jack on the back of the radio. The RF IN jack can be selected from the fr
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00126.html (8,685 bytes)

157. Re: Topband: MFJ 1025 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:42:40 EST
The MFJ noise cancellers require the the signals from both antennas are equal level. That means that with the 1025 that the "noise" antenna needs a preamp because it is usually a smaller, non-resonan
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00132.html (9,775 bytes)

158. Re: Topband: MFJ 1025 (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:41:11 EST
This brings me to a question about the FT1000 MP MK V Field that I am using: Last season I found that using the DSP noise reduction and the 250Hz crystal filter from Yaesu gave best signal to noise.
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00148.html (8,736 bytes)

159. Re: Topband: Stew Perry TBDC changes being considered (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:27:04 EST
I would vote for adding another instance of this very enjoyable contest format. Near one of the equinoxes sounds like a very equitable placement. I would also suggest collecting several ideas, and th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00186.html (8,586 bytes)

160. Re: Topband: Beverage height issues (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:55:28 EST
I also experimented with a BOG versus a traditional Beverage (identical 800' length and direction). I concluded the traditional Beverage was much better. Based on comments here I may try the BOG expe
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00216.html (7,898 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu