Mail Archive Search: <+from:w2pm@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

61. TopBand: W1BB (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 13:13:20 -0400 (EDT); If anyone is interested in photos of the famous W1BB original station equipment let me know. Most of his stuff is on display at the musum of wireless & steam in east greenwich, ri. 73 Pete -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00147.html (6,596 bytes)
62. Topband: ICE 135B Preamp Image Issue (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:47:38 EDT; I am getting significantly strong images on 160 with this preamp - 2nd season with new rx antennas and lines, no remote switching relays like I had last year which I suspected had rectifying contact; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00104.html (7,194 bytes)
63. Re: Topband: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:04:34 -0400; Jim - I dont know how high your doublet may be BUT I'd recommend an Inverted L since you have the horizontal space for it.. A low horizontal antenna won't buy you much regardless of the matching issu; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00120.html (6,720 bytes)
64. Re: Topband: Potting compound for beverage transformers. (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 20:37:24 EST; I ve used Home Depot epoxy as well and after it's dried apply plain-jane silicone seal to the wire entry points -- seems to adhere well to the insulation altho I dont know abt teflon... _____________; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00044.html (7,265 bytes)
65. Re: Topband: Ferrite beads or chokes for .75 inch CATV? (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:03:23 -0500; Unless there are ferrites which fit I'd use an in-line choke made on a length of standard RG213 size coax with shrink tubing around it - just like Wireman sells - and simply connect it onto the rigid; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00067.html (7,176 bytes)
66. Re: Topband: Receiving Loops (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:24:00 EST; Id be especially careful to choke the feedline at the loop - esp on a tower with all that metal so close else you're loop will be a great noise magnet. _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00280.html (7,417 bytes)
67. Re: Topband: dx last night (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:39:26 EST; Interesting - here in NNJ around 0200Z conditions were quite good - the band almost sounded like 20meters into EU. And this is with very modest equipment and rx antennas ... _________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00302.html (7,318 bytes)
68. Re: Topband: Reward Yaesu? (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 09:08:18 EST; This is not a ARRL bash but the quality of their technical reviews has declined over the years despite having more "details" available - they seldom miss the details that underlie these problems but; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00008.html (7,261 bytes)
69. Re: Topband: The answer is $$$$ (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:13:10 EST; I think what Tom may have meant is that it would have less costly IF they solved the issue a lot earlier. Who knows what Yaesu is really thinking but I can tell you at my firm - Nortel - customer fee; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00054.html (7,790 bytes)
70. Topband: Connectors for top band use (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:53:10 -0500; I never thought I'd be concerned about RF connectors at 160 but I have recently discovered the hard way that those crimp on Radio Shack PL259's are quite unsatisfactory as they do not provide for a s; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00137.html (7,617 bytes)
71. Re: Topband: Notes on early JA to East Coast QSO's (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:21:20 EST; Im just depressed as I can't hear anything when you boys are working those guys.. I nearly threw my PC out the window the past few mornings looking at all the JA posts. I wonder why there are not man; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00180.html (7,636 bytes)
72. Re: Topband: 160 Meters and ARRL (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:28:45 EST; I think each person lobbying their local Director and showing there is a group constituency will do .. I dont think there needs to be torch carrying mob approach to get their attention but only a per; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00205.html (7,361 bytes)
73. Re: Topband: Notes on early JA to East Coast QSO's (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:55:36 EST; Thanx Wally and all for the great stories and encouragement. The fact is despite frustrating situations whenever I work any DX - anywhere in EU or even W6(!) which is of course duck soup on all the h; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00206.html (9,077 bytes)
74. Re: Topband: Top Band DXing Long Ago (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:13:39 EST; Just the other day on a local radio station they were playing a vintage Jean Sheppard program tape from the his old days on WOR AM - Jean was K2ORS and a well known writer and radio raconteur. The ta; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00226.html (7,679 bytes)
75. Re: Topband: Tailending etc (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:57:50 EST; I think 160 is far better behaved than all the others despite these issues coming up but in my view they can only be solved by the DX stations in not working these tailenders and other lids. That wil; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00204.html (7,163 bytes)
76. Re: Topband: UN7AM (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:23:14 EST; I agree that many of these guys dont really hear the DX but I also think many do and like badly behaved people who can't stand getting in a line politely they fear that unless they break etiquette li; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00224.html (7,085 bytes)
77. Re: Topband: etiquette (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:47:50 EST; This is a very good thing and, I'd suggest as well, the peer pressure threads like this create altho there is a fine line between that and personal attacks and all-out food fighting. Thankfully this; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00243.html (6,837 bytes)
78. Re: Topband: FEEDING AN END-FED LONGWIRE (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:14:05 EST; It's interesting to see the comments about "end fed long wires" working so well .. as a QRP'er on the higher bands I always note random wire antennas including end-fed ones (which are particularly ea; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00059.html (8,523 bytes)
79. Topband: S9SS (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:22:25 -0500; Heard S9SS on 80 - S9 plus 10 on the NE mini Flag for over 45 minutes. Then he QRT'd and went to 160 where I could barely detect he was in there - despite posts that he was very strong in NA - mostly; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00181.html (6,458 bytes)
80. Re: Topband: S9SS (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:06:19 EST; I dont know -- Im starting to think it's one of two things here at my QTH in suburban NNJ -- 1. local terrain with high density development attenuates low angle signals - I know the noise level is sh; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00186.html (7,603 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]