Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2xj@nyc.rr.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:51:30 -0500
The Potomac Analog FIM is no longer available, nor are the parts to repair them and calibration service is no longer available. The new meters are expensive digital units. But in broadcast we do not
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00308.html (10,051 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:12:19 -0500
As I posted earlier field measurement is not an accurate method of determining power. I seriously doubt an administration permit such a technique unless it was very dumbed down and produced very 'saf
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00310.html (11,119 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:17:04 -0500
In broadcast work the antenna impedance is first determined by calculation (now modeling) then the actual impedance are measured when the station is tuned up. Loading coils are not used at least not
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00312.html (10,347 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:56:06 -0500
If you can find a used FIM 22 it goes from 200 KHz to 550 KHz. That said I can not see determining EIRP by field measurement. There are just two many variables and a degree of engineering skill not p
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00314.html (10,396 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:42:33 -0500
The sign up procedure fails. There seems to be a problem with the majordomo address. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00327.html (8,921 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:49:22 -0500
Ahh but I think the FCC will see things much differently. I base this on the existing 60M regs where an ERP is specified: (i) No station may transmit with an effective radiated power (ERP) exceed- in
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00329.html (15,924 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:50:04 -0500
I would disagree. The signal measured along the ground is affected by ground losses and is subject to ground conductivity even though the charts show maximum gain along the ground. The signal radiate
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00330.html (10,546 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:50:42 -0500
That is not what I said. The skywave would only be stronger if field measurements on the ground were used to determine power due to various ground losses, ground conductivity, etc. when an RF ammeter
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00331.html (9,601 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Skywave for LF (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:04:32 -0500
True 500 KHz did it for Marconi 111 years ago. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00342.html (7,465 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:04:12 -0400
One has to be careful with 5/8 wavelength verticals. A radiator that is physically 5/8 wavelength is already electrically too tall. That is why a 300 foot BC tower would not work well at low angles o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00064.html (16,245 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 19:40:42 -0400
I think Carl may have his time line backwards. In the 20s and early 30s many stations used various forms of wire antennae including dipoles and various cage designs. During the 30s Dr Brown and colle
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00068.html (9,992 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 23:20:48 -0400
Having worked in the business over 54 years with LW MW and SW transmission systems up to 2 megawatts and having built numerous MW arrays to 12 towers I would respectfully suggest a quick check of fun
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00072.html (11,475 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: radial wire source (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:23:09 -0400
You really do not need stranded wire. Bare solid wire is typically used for grounds. and while the standard of 120 radials spaced 3 degress is a well known standard for ground systems, it is very rar
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00036.html (8,340 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:03:53 -0400
There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it is common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00134.html (8,648 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Receiving loops (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:16:04 -0400
Sensitivity is not always important. Small loops in general receive less noise and the real exercise is balancing the internal noise floor against the actual signal received. In some cases a loss up
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00135.html (11,843 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: full wave horiz loop (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:19:15 -0400
EZNEC is your friend. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00136.html (7,546 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:53:25 -0400
Probably part has to do with the fact that your vertical is 1/8 wavelength and rule of thumb is 1/8 wavelength or less do no have a significant influence unless extremely close. _____________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00148.html (8,011 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: More Amplifier info (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:01:25 -0400
A while back on another list there was a discussion about a robust amp can not be built in a table top size. I believe this applies to solid state amps as well. The key to building a gutsy solid stat
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00106.html (10,741 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: elevated counterpoise and lightning (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:49:09 -0400
Static drain chokes and ground rods should be SOP. The chokes drain static build up which usually prevents direct hits. The chokes are available from various broadcast suppliers. ____________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00401.html (8,480 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: elevated counterpoise and lightning (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:12:19 -0400
True but they are pretty wimpy. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00403.html (10,620 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu