Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5zn@w5zn.org: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: A newbie question (score: 1)
Author: Joel Harrison <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:20:42 -0500
Tom ole buddy...... Call me on the secret Zilla line and let's chat. We can hook a brother up !!!!!! :-)))) -- _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00146.html (8,263 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Rig Question (score: 1)
Author: Joel Harrison <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:40:23 -0500
Having just completed being host station for W1AW/5 and also a multi-op for the ARRL June VHF Contest where we had several guest operators at W5ZN who ranged from highly skilled HF ops, some mid leve
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00137.html (9,697 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:35:43 -0600
Greetings Bob & Reflector folks, Please allow me to provide a bit of my experience since I run both a broad side/end fire passive 8 vertical array (350 ft diameter) with a DXE controller AND a HiZ 8
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00268.html (12,188 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:42:12 -0600
Just to correct a typo, my HiZ 8 vertical array is spaced 200 ft, no 220 ft. www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00269.html (13,225 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:05:16 -0600
Stan - For about 8 years, up until this past spring, my shunt fed tower for 160 had a KT34XA (insulated elements, later upgraded to a KT36XA same insulated elements) at the top and I never experience
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00294.html (9,534 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:27:21 -0600
Mack, My actual on-the-air test and experience at my QTH in Arkansas has revealed the 8 vertical array systems outperform beverages. I wrote an article with graphs showing the signal performance diff
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00369.html (9,956 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Speculating via Stew posted scores (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:59:11 -0600
I have always admired WD5R's VERY quite rural QTH, which also helps tremendously! :-)) 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00448.html (9,295 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:28:54 -0600
This is starting to become very amusing to me. All the Contest folks are telling the DX'er they are over reacting and becoming emotional on remote operation, and they should just calm down and enjoy
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00313.html (11,106 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:00:34 -0600
Dave - you are correct. That very statement was rather boldly made by a prominent 160 meter person right here. At the time I thought about throwing the flag on that one but decided, then, not to. I k
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00086.html (9,572 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Proposal for Modification of DXCC Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:59:19 -0600
Larry - very interesting proposal worth serious consideration! For the record, per your request, I am affiliated only with me, the amateur, and do not use a remote station 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org _
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00091.html (11,011 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:26:23 -0600
You still haven't proven me wrong!! :-)) www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00106.html (11,892 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:10:10 -0600
Tom - Fair enough. I'll confess I don't know how this is controlled but since your station, the W8JI station is one of the RHR Premium stations that RHR subscribers can pay to use I will take it at f
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00118.html (13,110 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:19:54 -0600
Thanks Hillary! :-))) Sorry, Couldn't resist that one Tod. www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00165.html (13,071 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:34:51 -0500
If someone doesn't believe DXCC is a competition then you have never been to a DX club meeting, a DX Forum at a hamfest or attended a DX event where the "Stand up and count down" activity is conducte
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00150.html (13,720 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: TX3X on 160? (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:38:39 -0500
Due to the very high winds they are experiencing they have stated they will not erect the 160 antenna. 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.c
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00040.html (7,951 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:19:34 -0600
I would be very interested to know "who" at ARRL HQ told you than and holds that position! Is it someone in a position to render an "ARRL position"? I have always been told, have understood and follo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00388.html (8,283 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Received Signal Strengths (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:52:41 -0600
representation of your station's RX performance, or at least it never has for me, because evaluating or comparing signal levels would be very difficult. I use a calibrated panadapter where I get ver
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00160.html (9,060 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:38:40 -0600
Sounds very much like the propagation associated with the "remote" duct ! 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00203.html (7,658 bytes)

39. Topband: VP8STI 160 Meter Path (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:15:09 -0600
Tonight on 160 VP8STI had a good signal. Here in Arkansas their signal arrived from the NE from around 0115z until around 0200z peaking around 5 dB above my noise floor. Around 0200z they went "QRX"
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00554.html (7,105 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Topband Spotlight Propagation Theorem (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:10 -0600
For those who may be new to 160 (and you old dogs as well), or have not read his material, Carl K9LA offers some very good insight to 160 meter propagation, including the spotlight topic. k9la.us is
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00612.html (8,023 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu