Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@w8ji.com: 971 ]

Total 971 documents matching your query.

361. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:45:37 -0500
I thought the proper way of indicating clicks is with the signal report - 579k. I haven't heard this used in years. No one does that now, and they especially will not do it in a contest. Remember all
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00249.html (9,391 bytes)

362. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:26:44 -0500
And I DID contact each of the guys whose calls I cited during the contest. In fact, I contacted about this issue two years ago when he was making a mess in the JA window during the winter Stew, and t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00254.html (11,440 bytes)

363. Re: Topband: Keyclicks / AGC (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:23:18 -0500
There are several legal-limit contest stations within a few miles of me and I'm used to a strong-signal environment. And how it can pump AGC causing audible artifacts that are not in the transmitter.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00257.html (7,814 bytes)

364. Topband: Signal complaints and auto bias (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:07:10 -0500
If your amplifier uses automatic bias, it can cause clicks. There are two things that will prevent or minimize this. 1.) Any auto bias system should not fully cut the tubes off. The tubes should stay
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00261.html (8,660 bytes)

365. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:58:15 -0500
In W8JI's very rural area minimum main lobe beamwidth is more valuable to him than minimum sidelobes. Tom's choice of 330 foot broadside spacing in a very rural area with little or no local RFI makes
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00013.html (13,670 bytes)

366. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:02:48 -0500
Hi Frank, I used a pair of 270 foot spaced broadside 580 foot Beverages for several years but the improvement was insignificant compared to a single 580 foot Beverage. I replaced them with single 900
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00018.html (12,846 bytes)

367. Re: Topband: Phase and Polarity -- They are Very Different (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:33:21 -0500
"Phase inversion" is a long used term for inverting the phase of any signal. It appears with discussions of push-pull amplifiers, and it is equally used in RF phasing systems. Phase inverter and phas
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00035.html (12,174 bytes)

368. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:02:46 -0500
The "Wullenwever" antenna was never a low-noise high performance antenna. It was simply a system designed to find direction over a very wide frequency range. The multitude of elements increased bandw
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00037.html (10,662 bytes)

369. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:42:34 -0500
Out of curiosity... with so many narrow-pattern receive antenna configs, how do typical contest stations check different directions after a CQ? Frank, I still want to come visit your station during a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00039.html (12,722 bytes)

370. Topband: Snap and seal connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:32:11 -0500
Questions about so called "water proof" connectors came up etc. As a result, I will include a few things which should be good practice because I discovered, for example, that everyone does not tape t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00048.html (8,953 bytes)

371. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:56:05 -0500
It was simply a system designed to find direction over a very wide frequency range. The multitude of elements increased bandwidth, but the physical width in wavelengths is the primary determinant of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00049.html (11,997 bytes)

372. Re: Topband: Soliciting suggestions on our receive antennas for 5X8C (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:15:31 -0500
So put you're receive antenna hat on. We suspect the ground is the problem. We are located on the shore of Victoria Lake at a resort. The soil appears to be sandy but with fresh water lake nearby. 20
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00088.html (12,527 bytes)

373. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:53:10 -0500
I have been wondering if the antenna element in phased arrays could be a loop rather than a vertical. My thinking is that the loop has some level of directivity so phasing two of them should result i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00107.html (13,112 bytes)

374. Re: Topband: VE3DO Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:53:30 -0500
A detailed analysis of the VE3DO Loop is on my web site: http://www.ok1rr.com/index.php/antennas/8-the-ve3do-receiving-loop A NEC file for further investigation is available via email upon request. T
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00115.html (12,287 bytes)

375. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:22:06 -0500
Thanks for the insightful reply. Looks like there is no free lunch here- I can't get better performance by simply using a different circle array element. Bummer, I will have to stick with the vertica
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00122.html (15,657 bytes)

376. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:08:31 -0500
My question for this astute reflector is whether there is any reason multiple receivers can't be connected to the array - listening in the same or different directions. Simply by multiple layers of t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00133.html (11,929 bytes)

377. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:19:19 -0500
I want to correct this: I experimented here with very large arrays years ago by watching signals and watching phase, and I found skywave 160 signals commonly have phase and level variations between a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00134.html (12,618 bytes)

378. Re: Topband: VE3DO Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:32:12 -0500
Not so. Time to put this misconception to rest. Read my description of K9AY Loop operation in the most recent ARRL Antenna Book and review the description of a DF loop with sense antenna in that, or
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00140.html (8,957 bytes)

379. Re: Topband: Broadband dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:27:34 -0500
It's the reference to termination resistors in the SPX data sheet that bothers me. Tom G3OLB You mean this part of the SPX data sheet that screams "dummy load"? :-) "Tower guys are made of tough poly
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00177.html (8,211 bytes)

380. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 07:55:18 -0500
Forgive me, please, if I'm re-hashing a bit of the "...same-old, same-old" here, but I am really curious as to any "real world" experiences that might be out there in the matter of elevated radials,
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00009.html (12,619 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu