Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

141. TopBand: Re: Echos (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 07:35:25 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Common sense and logic go a long way Earl. It's too bad when good old fashioned common sense gets displaced by junk science. I certainly agree with you Earl. It's common; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00465.html (8,390 bytes)
142. TopBand: From the bit bucket (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 09:01:22 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Dan, Thanks for the great post. Out of ALL of us, you are in the best position to know what really happens. This issue is a lot like the elevated radial issue. Some th; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00467.html (10,365 bytes)
143. TopBand: SSB Ragchewers in DX area (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 07:00:52 +0000; I hope this doesn't start a flame war, but it might be good to remind people others can work DX long after YOUR local sunrise. For the past three days, DXers have been ragchewing on SSB in the DX are; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00478.html (7,135 bytes)
144. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 07:00:52 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi All, That may be true for ground rods only driven near the surface, at dc, or at VHF, but certainly not for what everyone has been talking about. The skin depth is at; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00479.html (8,910 bytes)
145. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:19:50 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> It would certainly be much better than sticking two rods in the very top layer and measuring the surface at near-dc frequencies. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00494.html (7,600 bytes)
146. TopBand: Question YB0ARA/9 SUNRISE EFFECTS Question (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:31:01 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> I would like to ask a question. What do people mean by a "duct"? When I read some of the comments, it appears a duct is credited for signals "focusing" in one area and no; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00518.html (7,949 bytes)
147. TopBand: Update from 9M0C (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 23:10:08 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> I don't know how to forward this to G3XXR, but the ONLY cure for noise like this is directivity in the antenna (in other words, by focusing the antenna only in the direct; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00182.html (8,225 bytes)
148. TopBand: QRM frequencies (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 09:59:12 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> No one listens there. Many multiples of 10 KHz are plauged from time to time with broadcast mixing or harmonics. During our sunrise 1820-1825 is occupied with splattering; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00205.html (7,439 bytes)
149. TopBand: 9M0C, day 6 and counting down, in GA (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 09:59:12 +0000; Once again (as usual) 9M0C had a readable signal. He was readable from about 1125Z to 1155Z, peaking 569 at 1145Z. He sounded like he pulled the plug around 1200Z. Once again it was QRZ W8? but this; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00206.html (7,145 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 149
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]