Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wd8dsb@gmail.com: 233 ]

Total 233 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Power Line Noise Direction Finding (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:08:11 -0500
Hello Topbanders, For the past few months I have been plagued by what I suspected was power line noise on 160 meters, and finally was able to track it down to a power line pole 0.66 miles from my hou
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00020.html (8,905 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: DSL Filter (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:08:45 -0500
Today I built the ADSL filter today that Rag (LA6FJA) provided the link for, and it solved my DSL crashing problem. I fought this problem for numerous years when running 100 watts on 160 meters and p
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00217.html (8,264 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Antenna terminations (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:41:10 -0400
I've covered my resistors and solder joints with GE Silicone II sealant I do the same thing with my pennant termination resistors (just cover them with GE Silicone II sealant). 73's Don (wd8dsb) ____
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00109.html (7,786 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Using GE silicone as antenna sealant. (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:17:13 -0400
be very sure that if you pick GE silicone sealant.. (RTV or whatever you This is a very good point, and this is the reason I use GE Silicone Sealant II versus GE Silicone Sealant I. GE Silicone Seala
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00118.html (7,240 bytes)

5. Topband: ADSL Filter (simple surface mount design) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:43:28 -0400
In February of this year I built another ADSL filter originally designed by OZ1CTK, but this time I used off the shelf surface mount components (my original build used through hole components, etc.).
/archives//html/Topband/2013-04/msg00011.html (7,558 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Ferrite Source (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:16:21 -0400
Dean, I purchase the 2.4" O.D. 31 mix cores (Fair-Rite part number 2631803802) from Arrow Electronics, and the single quantity pricing is currently $4.83 per part. Shipping is $8.00, but the low piec
/archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00012.html (8,766 bytes)

7. Topband: 160 meter interference caused by bad cable on AT&T u-verse wireless gateway (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:25:46 -0400
This month a beacon like CW signal appeared on 1.816 Mhz at my location (24 hours a day, 7 days a week), and yesterday with the help of my neighbor I was able to locate the source of the signal which
/archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00006.html (7,180 bytes)

8. Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:06:58 -0400
Digging back through the archives I found lots of discussion about the "best" transformer to use with flags, pennants and beverages. The discussions included material type, and style (toroid vs. bino
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00221.html (9,090 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:31:45 -0400
I had additional offline conversations with Rick (N6RK), and Carl (KM1H), and below is my official response to my original post about RX antenna transformer windings and complex impedance measured on
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00235.html (9,487 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:11:09 -0400
I've been using Radio Shack 30 AWG insulated wire (wire wrap wire) to wind my binocular cores for RX antennas. It comes in 50 foot spools, and you can buy it in Blue, Red, or White. This insulated wi
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00252.html (9,858 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 07:33:25 -0400
Approximately 128 deg from WD8DSB (EM69) using small DF loop. _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00014.html (9,634 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:02:49 -0400
I'm mapping the data, but nothing to hang my hat on at this time. The data from Steve (KK7UV) does not intersect any of the other reports (odd). A heading from W8JI or AA1K would be very helpful. Don
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00017.html (9,312 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW -BTW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:30:58 -0400
OK, while we are on the topic another very big factor to think about is magnetic north vs. true north (I have tried to not bring this up in the past). I don't expect any response to this, but this ha
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00029.html (10,780 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:32:23 -0400
Having more time this evening I went to an open field with two different portable DF antenna systems (shielded loop, and terminated flag), and I'm now going to say the signal is 140 degrees from my l
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00045.html (9,301 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:37:12 -0400
Oops, I compensated for true north backwards on my last report. Therefore I should have said the signal is 130 degrees from my location just NE of Indianapolis (130 degrees True heading which is very
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00046.html (10,297 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:39:56 -0400
Paul and Gang, Based on Pauls heading and a few other headings that intersect Pauls heading, it looks like the signal is originating from the lower half of NC, or the NE part of SC that touches NC. H
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00052.html (8,930 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:28:38 -0400
Hi Guys, K5ESW reported the following : The 3501.5 carrier is audible in daylight in Raleigh, NC. It is running What would be interesting to know is if anyone can hear this signal 24 hours a day, and
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00065.html (9,673 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 04:02:16 -0500
To follow up on Toms comments about high angle, I have noticed that at my home QTH where I have have 3 pennants (one pointing 40 deg, one pointing 160 degrees, and one pointing 300 deg), that normall
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00077.html (11,626 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 07:07:56 -0500
Hi Rick, The beacon that you mention (what I assume I'm hearing around 3.500.9 this morning between 1130 to 1200 UTC) is on a lower frequency (approximately 0.9 Khz lower) than what I was previously
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00134.html (8,722 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:14:37 -0500
Rick and gang, as a follow up I just contacted Bill (w4hbk) via e-mail, and the QRSS beacon that you mentioned above was definitely not the signal we were tracking last week. Bill said the following
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00136.html (8,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu