Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wes_n7ws@triconet.org: 290 ]

Total 290 documents matching your query.

141. Re: Topband: Ticks (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:15:57 -0700
It's just the beginning of the thunderstorm season here (it's late) so I needed to tilt the Inverted-L over and keep it from being a lightning rod. It was a balmy104F while I was doing this but a sma
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00026.html (8,669 bytes)

142. Re: Topband: Unsubscribe (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:21:56 -0700
Good question.  My email client has a delete button that fixes all of these worries. Wes  N7WS On 7/17/2019 8:08 AM, Doug Renwick wrote: Why do people leaving a list always have to announce it? To ma
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00045.html (8,005 bytes)

143. Re: Topband: Unsubscribe (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:24:02 -0700
Too funny!!! Wes Mark K3MSB _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00046.html (7,761 bytes)

144. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:01:06 -0700
Personally, I would and do, avoid a FCP antenna.  W8JI has done some analysis on these and I value his insight. http://www.w8ji.com/fcp_folded_counterpoise_system.htm There is simply too much handwav
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00092.html (10,041 bytes)

145. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:10:18 -0700
I guess I should have added "useful to me."  At my location, I wouldn't dream of having elevated radials less than 6 feet above ground.  Running them through the cactus and bushes could be just as di
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00096.html (12,829 bytes)

146. Re: Topband: Summer Update & a Surprise (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:54:22 -0700
It helped you know what his opinion is. Wes  N7WS UNFORTUNATELY K1JT and FT 8 killed amateur radio on 6 meters. It will kill it on 160 meters,and SOON it will kill all amateur radio activity on all b
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00153.html (8,585 bytes)

147. Re: Topband: BOG height (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:01:34 -0700
Doesn't "BOG" mean, Beverage On Ground?  If so, isn't the answer, "on the ground"? Wes  N7WS I am looking for any additional info that I can get to supplement what I have found online already so good
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00028.html (9,405 bytes)

148. Re: Topband: 160 (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:08:15 -0700
Sounds good to me. I would add that I have made some FT-8 QSOs, mostly on the day it arrived and before I grasped the implications, but also some more recently.  That said, although I am uploading to
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00080.html (11,873 bytes)

149. Re: Topband: 160 (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:08:58 -0700
Or this one man expedition: E6ET will be active in FT8 mode focus the 20m during the day and 40/60m during the night. A 40m or 60m station will be active all night, *from 7:00 UTC (20:00 local) to 17
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00085.html (11,125 bytes)

150. Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 09:26:38 -0700
Perhaps more informative, read it and weep:  https://clublog.org/dxreport.html Wes  N7WS Are we really not utilizing our bands? You decide. W0MU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.cont
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00124.html (8,168 bytes)

151. Re: Topband: 160 portable vertical (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:09:26 -0700
He will probably hear as well as he's heard using QRP. I still use the TX inverted-L on receive and think that I have general parity between hearing and being heard running only 500W (7-10 dB below m
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00196.html (8,708 bytes)

152. Re: Topband: Inverted L - newbie questions (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:04:59 -0700
How many high-powered BC stations do you have around? Wes  N7WS Because I was impatient to see what was going on, I grounded the shield to a single copper-plated ground rod and connected my MFJ259B.
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00230.html (8,248 bytes)

153. Re: Topband: Hairpin match to inverted L? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:27:30 -0700
You mean physically lengthen the wire. Unfortunately, the added horizontal radiation may defeat the intended purpose.  Ir pays to model. Wes  N7WS On 9/1/2019 12:07 PM, FZ Bruce wrote: The reason to
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00010.html (7,970 bytes)

154. Re: Topband: Hairpin match to inverted L? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:27:59 -0700
No. Wes  N7WS _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00011.html (7,854 bytes)

155. Re: Topband: Hairpin match to inverted L? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 16:53:56 -0700
That's exactly what I do; shorten the radiator to create a capacitive feedpoint Z and shunt that with inductance to make a resonant impedance step-up at the desired frequency. That said, my original
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00015.html (10,453 bytes)

156. Re: Topband: inverted l (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 16:57:42 -0700
Anything will resonate at some frequency.  The question should be will it be a good match at the desired frequency. Wes  N7WS On 9/1/2019 4:02 PM, doug dietz wrote: Guys Will a invereted L a quarter
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00016.html (6,860 bytes)

157. Re: Topband: Inverted L redux (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 12:42:00 -0700
Four 50-60 footers. See: https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/files/antenna_ground_system_experiment_4.pdf for my rational. Wes  N7WS On 9/2/2019 12:08 PM, N4ZR wrote: More as an experiment and a thought-p
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00027.html (8,493 bytes)

158. Re: Topband: spark gap construction ideas for 160m tower (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:07:25 -0700
Spark has been prohibited since 1934. :-) Making the spark gap is simple.  What has me asking for ideas is the weather element - we have a lot of snow, ice, rain here and a spark gap needs to keep th
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00019.html (8,555 bytes)

159. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:28:55 -0700
I'm of a like mind with FT-8 QSOs. I've broken down and make them because of a friendly club competition, and I put them on LoTW, but I don't count them for DXCC credit.  (No argument with those that
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00079.html (8,698 bytes)

160. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:19:18 -0700
I think in Frank's case the WAS 50-mile rule applies. Wes  N7WS Please think again. Many topbanders use antennas and feedlines that extend beyond a 500 meter diameter circle. Please don't disparage u
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00103.html (9,577 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu