Mail Archive Search: <+from:zl3ix@inet.net.nz>

Results:

References: [ +from:zl3ix@inet.net.nz: 233 ]

Total 233 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: Meanook again (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:09:29 +1300; No it isn't Bob! Try working across into the bottom half instead. I had my best opening to the US since moving to this QTH on the 12th. 73, Greg, ZL3IX; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00112.html (6,877 bytes)
22. Topband: Foglight propagation (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:56:46 +1300; The propagation buffs call it spotlight propagation, but for the SP I call it FOGLIGHT PROPAGATION. Only 10 (yes ten) Q's from ZL, and those all with the big guns. I sat on W8JI's frequency for 2 hou; /archives//html/Topband/2001-12/msg00177.html (6,664 bytes)
23. Topband: CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:35:43 +1300; I agree with Jeff (K1ZM) when he says that folks will soon catch on. Back in the early 70's, before US had operating rights on SSB below 3.8 MHz, all of us in Eu (I was operating G3UBR in those days); /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00134.html (7,309 bytes)
24. Topband: Using a 40673 in a KD9SV 160m pre-amp? (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:26:07 +1300; My solution to this, Steve, is to insert a high pass filter between the antenna and the preamp. The one I use has at least 40 dB rejection from 1.6 MHz downwards. Then not only is the preamp protect; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00176.html (7,607 bytes)
25. Topband: ICE 403 filter (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Gregory Smith); Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:26:37 +1300 (NZDT); If anyone wants a filter that gives better than 40 dB rejection from 1.6 MHz down, drop me a line and I will pass on the circuit. It was derived from standard filter tables, and uses 3 coils wound on; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00208.html (6,491 bytes)
26. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 21:51:56 +1200; My apologies for revisiting this thread, which was discussed briefly last month. I am tempted to try a sloper as the first Topband antenna from my new QTH here in ZL, as it will be quicker to get goi; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00017.html (7,849 bytes)
27. Topband: Sloper/shunt feed (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:18:23 +1200; Many thanks to all for the prolific comment I have received on the above. There were one or two folks who said I should give the sloper a miss, but most said I should try it. The general concensus is; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00029.html (6,578 bytes)
28. Topband: Gamma match theory (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:01:53 +1200; Can anyone point me to a theoretical treatment of the gamma match (preferably in electronic format). I need one that assumes a working knowledge of Smith charts, and covers low band issues such as sh; /archives//html/Topband/2001-07/msg00034.html (6,663 bytes)
29. Topband: 160m international contest scoring (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:50:14 +1300; Hi Bill, As another op who happens not to live in Region 2, I must add my opinion to Steve's on this one (in spite of adding to the "endless debate"). It's not just a question of being fair in the co; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00065.html (7,985 bytes)
30. Topband: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:21:42 +0200; Hi guys, I also have a question about Beverages. I have heard in the past that they work best over lousy soil, but are not so great over good soil. Having just moved to Christchurch, ZL, from ZS, I f; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00094.html (8,091 bytes)
31. Topband: Good soil vs bad soil (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 12:41:50 +0200; Having just moved to ZL recently, I decided to measure the soil conductivity with a view to getting an idea of what kind of radiation characteristics I can expect from a 160m vertical. (I hope to be; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00135.html (7,896 bytes)
32. Topband: Stew Perry (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 15:39:01 +0200; Hi Milt and Tom and the Topband gang, As an ex ZS operator I agree with Tom on this one. In fact picking out the 10 watters would have been nigh on impossible from ZS. Plenty of high power stations g; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00073.html (7,552 bytes)
33. Re: Topband: Receivers (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:13:14 +1300; my on believe. It would be interesting to know what the actual shape of this filter is. As Tom said, it is physically impossible for a "brick wall" filter of this bandwidth to avoid ringing. If the; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00043.html (9,053 bytes)
34. Topband: Proposed new amateur regulation in VK (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:22:08 GMT; If you don't have a VK or ZL call, you can ignore this. Others go and look at http://www.aca.gov.au/aca_home/issues_for_comment/discussion/amateur_review_disc _paper.htm p35 looks ominous. 73, Greg,; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00047.html (6,442 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:13:33 +1300; I agree. I tried a mixer a few years back using these devices, after being sent a RadCom article by G3PQA, and the performance was indeed impressive. My experience of southern hemisphere operating,; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00111.html (8,804 bytes)
36. Re: Topband: Assistance Needed (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 08:25:38 +1300; Hi David, Another one you may like to consider is a version of a half sloper. These conventionally use an existing tower. The braid of the feed coax is attached to the top of the tower, an approxima; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00145.html (8,364 bytes)
37. Topband: SteppIR Yagi's and Topband (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:18:12 +1300; There was a reference on this Reflector a few months back from someone who used a SteppIR yagi as top loading for his mast on 160m. I would be interested to hear from anyone else who has done this. I; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00012.html (7,282 bytes)
38. Topband: Plate chokes (Balun thread) (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:32:04 +1300; Back in the 80's, when I constructed my homebrew amp, I came up with the idea of removing the plate coupling cap and using a cathode coupling cap instead (cold side of the PI network). I coupled the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00017.html (7,951 bytes)
39. Re: Topband: Transceiver Key Clicks (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:32:56 +1300; Hi Guys, I have been watching this thread with some interest, although clicky transceivers are not a problem in this part of the world, due to the low population density. One thing comes to mind, tho; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00055.html (8,547 bytes)
40. Re: Topband: KH6ZM Pileup and Operating Manners (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:56:40 GMT; definitely the hobby, especially over the past few years of bad propagation. If you know who is on a freq, you can judge whether there is prop or not. For example last night, when I could not hear t; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00283.html (7,697 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]