Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Small\s+Receiving\s+Loops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Small\s+Receiving\s+Loops\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: Small Receiving Loops (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 12:43:58 -0500; There's a short article on matching small receiving loops in Technical Correspondence in QST Sept. 1995. I wrote another version of that article for the SMC newsletter, which includes some informatio; /archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00052.html (6,876 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: Small Receiving Loops (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 15:52:09 -0500; K6ZZ asks: The lower capacitance allows you to resonate a larger loop, though this isn't a problem with a 5 foot/side loop on 160. RG-62 has even less capacitance than 75 Ohm foam, and a 5 foot squar; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00400.html (7,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]