Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+VS6DO\s+$was\s+3x$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+VS6DO\s+$was\s+3x$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: VS6DO (was 3x) (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 05:27:25 +0000; Earl and company "Rumor" had it that VS6DO was running something far more subsatntial than a pair of 3-500's to put out that very very big signal we all used to listen to on 80 and 160 back in the mi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00203.html (7,474 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: VS6DO (was 3x) (score: 1): Author: donhall@myriad.net (Donald B. Hall); Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 23:54:24 -0800; I was once in VS6DO shack and he did have a large "speech processor" 73 Don K5AQ -- To: <topband@contesting.com> a listen -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@co; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00206.html (8,317 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: VS6DO (was 3x) (score: 1): Author: danmec@inet.uni-c.dk (Ragnar Otterstad); Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 09:43:57 +0100; As one who had the pleasure of knowing the true gentleman and visiting and operating from VS6DOs station let me tell you it was not " a tuned wire thrown out of the window". It was tuned all right bu; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00208.html (8,862 bytes)
4. TopBand: Re: VS6DO (was 3x) (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan); Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 23:11:14 -0700 (MST); Dave, I operated from VS6DO on a couple of occasions in the 80s and I think your rumor mill has it wrong. You can arguably get more out of a 1000 watts of plate dissipation from a 4-1000 than you ca; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00209.html (9,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]