Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Tower\s+used\s+on\s+160m\s+vs\.\s+Packet\s+Node\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Tower\s+used\s+on\s+160m\s+vs\.\s+Packet\s+Node\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Tower used on 160m vs. Packet Node (score: 1): Author: k6ur@lightspeed.net (Ron Hill K6UR); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:36:13 -0800; I am thinking of putting up an inverted L antenna using my 89 ft tower however I have a packet node with uhf/vhf antennas in constant use. Has anyone experienced problems with RF giving problems of g; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00193.html (7,157 bytes)
2. TopBand: Tower used on 160m vs. Packet Node (score: 1): Author: w9ja@contesting.com (W9JA Paul Hellenberg); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:18:44 -0600; HI Ron They have co-existed at my place for years. 73 LG Paul W9JA W9JA/4 706 745 5696 Tru Line Lithographing Inc.PO 565 Sturtevant , Wi. 53177 414-554-7300 X125 Fax 414-554-8217 Paul Hellenberg e-ma; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00197.html (7,708 bytes)
3. TopBand: Tower used on 160m vs. Packet Node (score: 1): Author: W8AV@aol.com (W8AV@aol.com); Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 07:19:18 -0500 (EST); Ron, Just to add some more information to this thread, I have a 150 foot tower here that I excite as a series fed vertical on 160. This tower also contains a 4 over 4 stack for 20 meters, a 2 over 2; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00231.html (8,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]