Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+QSL\s+card\s+checking\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+QSL\s+card\s+checking\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: <n4cc@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:50:00 -0600; _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00055.html (6,153 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:00:38 -0300; This is frustrating indeed as there are no DXCC card checkers in the USVI with 160-meter DXCC which the ARRL requires. They refuse to explain why. OK, so I will send the cards to them. But wait, this; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00056.html (8,041 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: n4cc <n4cc@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:12:44 -0600; Any card checker can check 160 meter cards now. The requirement for the card checker to have 160 meter DXCC was dropped. 73, Greg- N4CC Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original m; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00057.html (8,425 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: n7ng@bresnan.net; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:39:51 -0600; See "Field Checking of QSL Cards, 1) a) It seems the rule was "unliberalized" to some extent . . . -- N7NG/7 Any card checker can check 160 meter cards now. The requirement for the card checker to ha; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00058.html (8,718 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:35 -0700; Why not publish the current rule regarding 160M field checking and remove the confusion: http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-field-checkin <http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-field-checkin> 1) Entities Eligible for Field; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00060.html (12,060 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:43:39 -0700; I attained 160 meter DXCC around 5 years ago. I don't feel that it qualifies me to check QSL's. Even though I did it from the west coast :-) I can see where say 25 years ago, 160 meter DXCC really me; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00061.html (7,576 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:11:40 -0400; The CQ Magazine DX Marathon judge seems to have some superb smarts as to what validates a plausible contact. I know for sure he caught it when due to a typo of mine, I busted a callsign from a perfec; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00062.html (9,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]