- 1. Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:40:55 -0500
- Does anyone else have the constant carrier on 1820.0 at night? I've heard it for weeks, and it's interfered with several DX stations that I was trying to copy. And I see I'm not the only one. I just
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00014.html (7,118 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:42:00 -0500
- Oops, I meant 910 kHz, not 920. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00015.html (7,012 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Harry Kawanobe <jg7psj@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:00:35 +0900
- Mike, We have the same situation as you. 1820 is noisy in JA too. 73's -- Harry JG7PSJ,JD1BMH,KW2X _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00016.html (7,826 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: jcraig@mun.ca
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:34:50 -0230 (NDT)
- Does anyone else have the constant carrier on 1820.0 at night? I've heard Loud and clear in GN37. A raspy tone with hints of BC modulation. 73 Joe VO1NA This electronic communication is governed by
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00017.html (7,523 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:16:39 -0500
- It can be heard in Japan and Canada?! Where could it be coming from? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00018.html (6,746 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:59:53 -0500
- Hello Mike: I believe that the 1820 spurs are created from multiple sources. That is why you can hear it at many QTHs around the world (although the spur content is technically different with respect
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00019.html (8,545 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 22:30:55 -0500
- Hi Tim! Yes, as Joe stated, multiple sources is probably right. But I'd like to find out what they are. Every time I operate my R-4C, I think of you. I have four Sherwood filters in it that I bought
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00021.html (7,857 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: "Robin" <wb6tza@socal.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:15:01 -0700
- ALL of the 10 KHz frequencies are bad somewhere in NA, and the same issues apply to the 9 KHz spaced MW stations in other parts of the world. Second harmonic, and regular ordered products abound. Exa
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00023.html (11,264 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:39:36 -0700
- 73, Mike www.w0btu.com 1820 kHz is also 4 times the common 455 kHz IF. You could be hearing your own receiver(s). As a teenager, I used to listen to a 910 kHz AM station in Portland, OR, and some of
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00024.html (7,862 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:49:11 +0000
- At my QTH (suburban Washington DC FM19ka), I do not hear a steady carrier at 1820, but instead would describe it as a raucous cacaphony of buzzsaws from 1820-1827 or so, especially in evenings. What'
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00025.html (9,344 bytes)
- 11. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: k6xt <k6xt@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 07:27:41 -0600
- And southwest Colorado 73 Art K6XT~~ Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. ARRL, GMCC, CW OPS, NAQCC ARRL TA On 11/3/2012 6:54 AM, topband-request@contesting.com wrot
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00027.html (8,441 bytes)
- 12. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:03:20 -0400
- We can be sure it is not a harmonic of an IF. :-) 1820 is a particularly bad frequency because it involves 2nd harmonics of a popular channel (910) and also is a mixing product for many orders of mu
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00029.html (9,396 bytes)
- 13. Re: Topband: 1820 spur (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 18:13:58 -0500
- I understand that. I have heard weak spurs on multiples of 10 kHz that come and go on the low end of 160 ever since I put up Beverage antennas here. But the one on 1820 is the strongest I have ever h
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00046.html (8,699 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu