Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+49\s+contest\s+stations\s+caught\s+on\s+tape\s+this\s+AM\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 49 contest stations caught on tape this AM (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:49:55 +0000
I had the tape running this morning around 1100Z as I scanned the band and I caught 49 stations, and I posted the sound clip to http://n1eu.com/mp3/cq160ssb26Feb12_1100Z.mp3 That's what it sounded li
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00406.html (7,060 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 49 contest stations caught on tape this AM (score: 1)
Author: "KL7RA" <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:37:11 -0900
Hi Barry I was in the contest during your recording but didn't get a good opening to the east coast this year. I never had any luck running so I just went up/down the band calling everyone I could he
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00408.html (9,692 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 49 contest stations caught on tape this AM (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:15:59 -0600
Barry: I found your tape fascinating. I am very envious of the low noise level that was recorded - - beverages must make a difference. :) Although I heard, from my Idaho QTH, some of the same signals
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00410.html (10,421 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 49 contest stations caught on tape this AM (score: 1)
Author: Garry Shapiro <garry@ni6t.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:49:28 -0800
Tod, Your reference below to NI6T should be to NI5T. I was never happy about their callsign choice for their contest station, for obvious reasons, and your observation merely serves to maximize my di
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00421.html (11,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu