- 1. Topband: ARRL CW DX test (score: 1)
- Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@myfairpoint.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:51:03 -0500
- I should have asked this question during the contest but was a bit busy. Did anyone try to work us at PJ4X and not get through? Our 160 station was on 160 and 15 and both bands had receiving problems
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00332.html (6,839 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: ARRL CW DX test (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:19:40 -0800
- I'm assuming that you were at the house on the hill that Noah owns with a group. I operated from there a year or so ago, and helped string a Beverage along the road running down into Rincon. It worke
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00333.html (7,356 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: ARRL CW DX test (score: 1)
- Author: "Dale Long" <dale.long@prodigy.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:33:41 -0500
- I am sure Craig's post was not meant to be critical, and we cannot presume this was the problem. We do not even know whether they were indeed at Noah's station. There are now at least two well-equipp
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00339.html (9,185 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: ARRL CW DX test (score: 1)
- Author: "Nathan Moreschi" <n4ydu@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:04:02 -0500
- Craig, My first attempt around 0355z failed but about 35 minutes later it was pretty easy. I ran 100 watts to an inverted L (65 feet vertical and about 70 feet horizontal) with 3 quarter wave raised
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00349.html (8,033 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: ARRL CW DX test (score: 1)
- Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:03:33 -0800 (PST)
- Craig, The first night you were booming into TN. The second night you were hardly a whisper. PJ2T was only a bit louder the second night as I did my band scans. Thanks for 6 bands... 73, Julius Juliu
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00353.html (9,174 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu