Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Band\s+plan\s+on\s+160\s+during\s+SSB\s+contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Band\s+plan\s+on\s+160\s+during\s+SSB\s+contests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Band plan on 160 during SSB contests (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:16:24 +0000; Hi topband contesters, I fully support the suggestions made by John ON4UN. Working split on 160m during the contest is a lost battle. Signals are so weak sometimes and QSB so deep combined with short; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00212.html (7,780 bytes)
2. Topband: Band plan on 160 during SSB contests (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (Tom Baugh); Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 01:09:37 +0000; I am not opposed to John's recommendations except that most antennas for topband are relatively narrow in bandwidth so if John would'nt mind swapping frequencies.. The US takes the Freq's adjacent to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00216.html (6,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]