Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Claiming\s+160m\s+DXCC\s+\-\s+Sending\s+QSLs\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: g4puq@aol.com
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 04:49:16 -0400
I wonder if anyone out there can put my mind at ease. After 11 years of perseverance with my very bent Inv-L, 100w and questionable radials -? I finally worked my 100th 160m DXCC entity ( JW/SM0MDG)
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00112.html (7,038 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: Carl K9LA <k9la@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:36:35 -0400
Peter, Congratulations! 160m cards (along with deleted entities) may be checked at conventions when the appropriate ARRL personnel are in attendance. Friedrichshafen in June offers this service, as d
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00113.html (7,424 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:38:39 -0500
May I also add my congratulations. For those attending Hamcom 2009, I believe there will be a qualified 160 meter checker there this year. 73, Mike, W5UC _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00114.html (7,636 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:42:45 +0200
Carl K9LA schreef: Try to covince people to use the LotW. Then you dont need to send cards. -- Henk Remijn PA5KT email: pa5kt@remijn.net www: www.remijn.net __________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00115.html (7,376 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:22:16 -0400
Good luck with that!. I like the idea though. ARRL recommends registered mail assuming such service is available. There is more accountability here in the US for registered mail and hopefully between
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00117.html (8,889 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:00:40 -0700
Congratulations Peter. I had my 160m cards checked at the Visalia DX convention last month where ARRL officials were present. The checking was fast and efficient but the one surprise was that on the
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00120.html (8,620 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:29:08 -0700
The story I've heard is that some dishonorable hams have submitted cards where 18 MHz QSOs were changed to 1.8 MHz. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list T
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00121.html (8,135 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu