Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Comparing\s+antennas\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+160m\s+loaded\s+tower\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:18:41 -0500
This would have been more helpful to Ignacy before the second antenna went up, but taking off from Stan's question ... if you want to get a quick quantitative comparison between two transmitting ante
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00099.html (9,799 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: STEVE MCDONALD <ve7sl@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:27:24 -0700 (MST)
Pete, Ive found the best way to A/B antennas in real time is to listen on one of the hundreds of online Kiwi SDRs . You can flip from one antenna to the other instantly and the difference is readily
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00100.html (10,557 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:32:48 -0700
Even better is to use S Meter dropdown in the KIWI extensions menu.... it gives a strip chart style presentation that can be configured to easily show small differences in signal levels, far easier t
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00101.html (11,709 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:19:45 -0500
It's quite possible that the addition of a beam at 60 ft. could cause capacity hat effect changing the current flow in the tower. It might be worth modeling this. Jim - KR9U _________________ Searcha
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00103.html (8,104 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:26:28 -0500
I agree entirely - the challenge is to model a tower and two multiband yagis with sufficient fidelity. 73, Pete N4ZR Jim - KR9U I have a 100 ft tower with jk mid tri 40 on top. When shunt fed, it was
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00104.html (9,429 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:52:33 -0700
Further to Don and Steves comment about using an on-line KIWI WEBSDR to check your signal, I just uploaded a video I had made that shows how this works. This is a short 4 min Video, but shows how eas
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00105.html (9,512 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Comparing antennas was: Re: 160m loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:19:43 -0500
This is really cool. Somehow I had managed to miss the emergence of the Kiwi WEBSDR network.  Clearly, that *is* a better way 73, Pete N4ZR This is a short 4 min Video, but shows how easy it is to se
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00106.html (10,385 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu