Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Digital\s+on\s+160m\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:22:34 +0000
This winter I plan to try various digital modes on 160m (JT65, WSPR, V4, PSKxx etc), but I have no idea where to transmit. Are there any established frequencies or frequency ranges on Top Band where
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00580.html (7,243 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:42:59 -0500
Unfortunately, there seem to be two. 1807 and 1838 are where I have seen most digital transmissions on 160m. -- All rights reversed. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ...
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00581.html (7,177 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:55:24 -0500
1838 USB dial frequency seems to be popular for JT65 Traditional RTTY appears below 1810. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00582.html (7,198 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:48:04 +0000
Please donīt. There is enough QRM on Top Band already - fish buoy transmitters and (tele) phony operations to name the worst. Lew, W7EW/W7AT said it best: "The language of 160 Meters is CW". 73 Thor,
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00585.html (8,093 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:48:14 -0800
Don't knock it if you haven't tried it. While I haven't tried JT65 on 160 yet, I would like to do so. I've had considerable success working difficult paths with JT65 on 6M and on some of he HF bands.
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00588.html (8,580 bytes)

6. Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:56:16 -0800
I would like to nip this thread in the bud if possible. This has proven to be a very emotional subject. I think it is safe to say that using digital modes is something some people enjoy - and somethi
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00589.html (9,070 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:19:15 -0500
Are you saying we will be banned for for answering the original question about frequencies? Or just grumping about the use of 160? Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ UR RST IS
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00590.html (7,910 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:05:50 -0700
The K3UK schedule website has quite a few "check ins" that are clamoring to work JT65 on 160 meters - so another "source" for info on JT65...just go to the K3UK web site and hang around for a while,
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00591.html (9,861 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: "n4is" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:02:31 -0500
Ian It will be very nice above 1900 KHz. Regards Carlos N4IS --Original Message-- From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ian Wade G3NRW Sent: Thursd
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00594.html (8,630 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:03:08 +0000
perspective comes from having a 160m band of only 40kHz (1810-1850), not 200 kHz like the US enjoys. The bottom half of this 40kHz spectrum is more or less made unusable by Fishing Buoy transmitters
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00596.html (9,046 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:15:54 +0000
Tree My apologies for breaking the "rules" of this reflector. I had no idea that we were not allowed to talk about 21st century digital modes here. I now have the information I need. I will trouble y
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00597.html (8,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu