Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+EWEs\s+and\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+EWEs\s+and\s+radials\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: EWEs and radials (score: 1): Author: "Neil Carr G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:13:46 -0500; I have had good success with EWE antennas on 160m 12.5 x 5m, but appreciate over average ground the take off angle is around 35 degrees when using nothing more than a copper 1-2m ground rod. ON4UN (l; /archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00066.html (6,939 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: EWEs and radials (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:09:23 -0500; My simulations do not show the ground resistance making any significant difference to the take-off angle for an EWE. A really poor ground made the take-off angle of a single element version go up by; /archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00067.html (8,782 bytes)
3. Topband: EWEs and radials (score: 1): Author: "Neil Carr G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:27:52 -0500; Thanks to all for the on and off reflector replies. To sum up, don't waste your time adding radials unless your ground is real poor. 73 Neil G0JHC _______________________________________________ Topb; /archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00069.html (7,235 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]