Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+GAP\s+VERTICAL\s+QUESTION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+GAP\s+VERTICAL\s+QUESTION\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:35:11 -0500; I have already spoken extensively that your assertion is not proved, NOR is the counter-assertion proved. I have no intentions of adding to that. I am not persuaded either way, though BOTH sides of t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00350.html (9,608 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: Ashton Lee <Ashton.R.Lee@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:44:54 -0700; So here's a question. I have a vertical mounted on a cliff side that performs incredibly. My amateur's approach to figuring out why is that I modeled it in EZNEC as being elevated 400 feet. That show; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00351.html (10,302 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:14:27 -0500; So here's a question. I have a vertical mounted on a cliff side that performs incredibly. My amateur's approach to figuring out why is that I modeled it in EZNEC as being elevated 400 feet. That show; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00358.html (11,035 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:56:34 -0500; Short version: ** WARNING: Most locations do not have the fortunate circumstances to support sparse or miscellaneous radial systems without exaggerated loss, and the builder with constrained circumst; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00359.html (18,403 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:55:06 -0500; First of all RBN is showing changes well in excess of 6 dB with the removal of loss by replacing a faint radial system with an FCP. Remember that an FCP HAS NO GAIN. It only reduces loss. If the sign; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00362.html (8,375 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:52:27 -0800; On 12/13/2012 3:14 PM, Tom W8JI wrote: Somehow they thought moving the feedpoint eliminated the need for radials with an electrically short antenna, when the real mechanism was a 1/2 wave vertical wa; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00380.html (10,905 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:59:27 -0700; Mike that QTH looks alot like the Great Salt Lake of Utah where I have operated a few 160 meter 'tests running a balloon vertical. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband re; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00401.html (12,116 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:34:21 -0500; Wow, Dave! That sounds great!! Could you support a vertical 1/2 wave for 160 with a balloon? You could end -feed it at the base through a 1/4 wave of 450 ohm ladder line and it would be a FEARSOME 16; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00404.html (13,052 bytes)
29. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:42:26 -0800; Dave WX7G I learned about this QTH from Earl K6SE (SK). The terrain to the north isn't so great (high mountains), but toward CONUS is literally miles of salty lake bed. Also, it was pretty wet the ye; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00453.html (9,005 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]