Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+Use\s+of\s+Remote\s+Receivers\s+During\s+160\s+Meter\s+Contests\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:12:00 -0500
Ham radio, like life in general, is evolving. With a lot of technology change, it's a good time to breath some fresh air and let it jell out. E30FB did work a few NA, but only on signal peaks. Other
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00138.html (7,977 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:44:32 +0000 (UTC)
Xtreme category, where have I heard that term? Classical 160 meter operating involves real estate and the expenditure of lots of money or time for effective transmitting and receiving antenna systems
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00141.html (8,638 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:57:47 +0000
Hey Mike, This is why we work hard all our lives, so we can earn enough to do this. I, too, was on a small city lot most of my life. Noe I'm not (earned it). Dave, W5UN Classical 160 meter operating
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00143.html (11,152 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:10:11 -0700
On Tue,3/17/2015 9:44 AM, mstangelo@comcast.net wrote: Classical 160 meter operating involves real estate and the expenditure of lots of money or time for effective transmitting and receiving antenna
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00144.html (10,668 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:10:34 -0400
The easiest answer IMHO, is to drop any distinction between a receiver and transmitter. In other words, if you are going to remote a receiver, you might as well remote the whole station. Art ________
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00145.html (11,526 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:40:56 -0700
In other words, if you are going to remote a receiver, you might as well remote the whole station. Remoting an entire station (TX/RX) is far more complex, and also far more "invasive." It may, for ex
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00146.html (9,028 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:46:01 -0400
Jim, I take no side (yet) on this issue but RHR has changed that game. If you can't afford to build the remote station, you can easily rent a station for any contest and use it. That is entirely with
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00147.html (9,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu