Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hairpin\s+Matching\s+Coil\s+Questions\s+\-\s+BTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hairpin\s+Matching\s+Coil\s+Questions\s+\-\s+BTW\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Hairpin Matching Coil Questions - BTW (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:12:21 -0400; BTW, Jim The fact that you can't get the feed-point resistance above 27 ohms, sounds like you are just looking at the driving-point resistance of the inverted L in parallels with the inductance of th; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00201.html (8,841 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Hairpin Matching Coil Questions - BTW (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:11:23 -0400; BTW, Jim The Qs that you threw out for the inductor are OUTRAGEOUS! The only reason for raising the Q of the inductor is to reduce its losses that are going to be pretty small across 50 ohms, even at; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00265.html (15,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]