Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+V\s+vs\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+V\s+vs\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Peter Krulewitch <epetek1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:28:05 -0400; Have used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx fer your ideas.W2LL Sent from my iPhone ___________; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00091.html (6,951 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:35:22 -0500; The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other times) when horizontal polarization can work better. 7; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00092.html (7,939 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:48:51 -0500; An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent over correct? So a major part of an inverted "L" just as in a regular vertical is the ground system. Correct? Now how elevated; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00093.html (8,837 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 13:02:26 -0400; Peter, It depends on a lot of things: ground characteristics, number of radials, height of radials and the overall height available. Generally, over average-to-good ground and with 32 or more radials; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00094.html (8,355 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Peter Krulewitch <epetek1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 13:12:34 -0400; I should have stated for the comparison that I have 4 elevated radials under the inverted L W2LL Sent from my iPhone _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topban; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00095.html (9,715 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:23:12 +0000; times) when horizontal polarization can work better Dave, W0FLS<<< This conclusion regarding probability is supported through numerous observations over the years in various texts and documented in; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00096.html (9,087 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 13:35:23 -0500; SigAssuming your interested in DX, your L with four elevated radials will handily beat an inverted vee the vast majority of the time. 73. . . Dave, W0FLS I should have stated for the comparison that; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00097.html (9,600 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: fmoeves <fmoeves@twc.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:24:58 -0400; I agree with what others have said. Best thing I did here in my noisy area was a Rx antenna. There's no way I could listen to my inverted L here in KY. KB4QZH -- Original message --From: daraymond@i; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00100.html (8,575 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:25:38 -0400; Gents: I will support Fred's recommendation for RX antennas on TB. Even my modest back yard could fit three bi-directional EWE's in delta layout among the trees. I was flabbergasted at how well the s; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00101.html (9,879 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Steve Ireland <stevevk6vz@tpg.com.au>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:22:32 +0800; Hi Peter (and the reflector) As George AA7JV/C6AGU says: 'It depends on a lot of things: ground characteristics, number of radials, height of radials and the overall height available.' I'd add your g; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00105.html (10,655 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:53:16 -0400 (EDT); Hi Steve, Geomagnetic latitude isn't likely to be an issue in VK6, the geomagnetic equator in your part of the world is about ten degrees north of the geographic equator, it runs through the Phillipi; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00106.html (11,382 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 05:16:34 -0400; *The inverted L will out perform an inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other times) when horizontal polarization can work better. 7; /archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00108.html (8,586 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]