Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Misbehaving\s+verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Misbehaving\s+verticals\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Misbehaving verticals (score: 1): Author: Dennis Ashworth <dennis@ashworth.org>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 20:03:50 -0500; I have 4 identical short verticals (part of a broadside array) where EZNEC predicts a 12.5 ohm feed-point impedance. That seems reasonable, but my actual measurements indicate 25 ohms at resonance. M; /archives//html/Topband/2022-09/msg00004.html (7,692 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Misbehaving verticals (score: 1): Author: Radio KH6O <radio.kh6o@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:33:33 -0700; As a practicing mathematician, I can assure you that it's impossible for a computer model to capture *every* possible variable involved in real-life physical situations. We see that in not only the a; /archives//html/Topband/2022-09/msg00009.html (6,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]