Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Palomar\s+R\-X\s+Noise\s+Bridge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Palomar\s+R\-X\s+Noise\s+Bridge\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:57:18 -0500; The proper ferrites work well down into any frequency you want, even LF. I use them into UHF as a way to keep 2 and 4 bay yagis from having distorted patterns that can kill a good F/B. Several A-B te; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00264.html (15,330 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:12:05 -0500; Carl: I've read, at several places, that sleeve baluns are effective at VHF and above but not at HF frequencies..thoughts?? 72/73, Jim Rodenkirch -- former Tempest inspector for the U.S. Navy..ahhhhh; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00265.html (14,667 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:27:53 -0500; The lowest loss cable I have here is 75 Ohm 1" General Cable Fused Disc; its under a differnt name these days. Mostly air with poly discs and used for the 200' runs for 10M, 2M, and 222 MHz. For the; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00267.html (11,665 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:31:08 -0500; Maxwell sort of stumbled on it in later years with those tiny beads that seriously overheated with most amps. We "started" with the type that fit over RG-213 and went from there to custom made, the b; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00275.html (10,801 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:31:54 -0500; Dielectric losses become evident at 2M with 1500W and at 432 400W of steady carrier will heat up even the best N connectors and RG-213. For that reason many are switching to the 7/16 DIN. That has no; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00276.html (12,416 bytes)
26. Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: <mapa50@windstream.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:32:16 -0600; I just wanted to thank everyone who answered my question about coax impedance and how it would affect 1/4 wave stub length found and cut using a noise bridge. It won't. I though that was the way it w; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00277.html (8,330 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:35:06 -0500; Walt surely did "know his stuff" and he published some great material!! 73, Charlie, K4OTV Walt Maxwell was not only a real nice guy, he knew his stuff. Walt was a senior antenna design engineer for; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00278.html (10,920 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:46:37 -0500; Absolutely and I had the pleasure of meeting him and hear him speak. Unfortunately his very public arguments with Warren Bruene in QEX and elsewhere over the "Conjugate Match" and then showing up on; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00279.html (12,671 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]