Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Placement\s+of\s+RX\s+feedline\s+chokes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Placement\s+of\s+RX\s+feedline\s+chokes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:10:05 -0400; I have always used a 3 inch ferrite (TDK 9930) choke with for each Beverage RG6 feedline (13 turns) near the shack entrance. There is a common ground and on the remaining RG6 going to the radio (20 f; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00026.html (7,701 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:02:51 +0100; At each point where the common to differential mode conversion is likely to happen. In other words, where the current on the outside of coax shield is likely to get inside coax. Primary target points; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00029.html (7,399 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:59:34 -0800; On Wed,2/3/2016 10:10 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: It has come to my attention by a seasoned topbander that I have this all wrong and the decoupling coil should be close as possible to the Beverage; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00032.html (9,612 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:36:59 -0400; Interesting information Jim because my quietest Beverage is fed with some double shielded double foil (braid foil braid foil) with robust braid RG-6 type cable but in order to get it to fit a connect; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00033.html (10,105 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:48:39 -0800; Double shields in CATV cable are not handled like those in broadcast to separate signal return from "ground." In CATV, it's simply the "more is better" approach -- more shields in parallel reduces sh; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00034.html (8,160 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Greg Zenger <n2gz@gregzenger.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:45:17 -0500; "More shields in parallel reduces...shield coverage"? This seems counter intuitive, or did you mistype? Greg N2GZ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00036.html (8,561 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Placement of RX feedline chokes (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:32:20 -0800; Thanks. Brain cramp. :) Should have said reduces shield resistance and increases coverage. 73, Jim _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00038.html (8,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]