Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s+on\s+160\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s+on\s+160\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: QRP on 160? (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 22:22:23 +0100; No, I guess I should have clarified what I was saying . . . Sure, my 160m mobile whip is much less efficient than a full-sized 160m aerial . . . but I have calibrated the S Meter on my Mobile Rig so; /archives//html/Topband/2024-07/msg00020.html (7,780 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: QRP on 160? (score: 1): Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:40:34 -1000; In the 2000s I worked a few contests running 5 watts. Two or three ARRL 160 contests using a 38' top loaded vertical at home and a couple contests from a land bridge out in the Great Salt Lake of Uta; /archives//html/Topband/2024-07/msg00021.html (9,005 bytes)
23. Topband: QRP on 160? (score: 1): Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:15:59 -0700; <Is anyone regularly using say, 25W or less on 160? <73, <Jeff KH6O / 6 These days, with sky high noise levels...... QRP + 160m doesn't belong in the same sentence. Everything south of the equator ha; /archives//html/Topband/2024-07/msg00022.html (7,799 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]