- 1. Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1)
- Author: "Tod - Idaho" <tao@skypoint.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:05:37 -0500
- This sounds like a really good idea. It should be much easier to establish receivers in interesting locations than transmitting stations. One small matter is access to the internet, but I think that
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00079.html (10,520 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:23:38 -0400
- While the concept of a receiver is interesting, many good locations would not be able to participate. The best and least expensive internet connections are in populated areas, right where copy is wor
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00082.html (10,193 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 21:04:52 -0700
- Not necessarily. You could do a reverse of the NCDXF system whereby the receiver could utilize directional receive antennas with each direction in a preassigned time slot. A series of ten one minute
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00085.html (9,027 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu