Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RG\-6\/CAC\-6\s+CABLE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RG\-6\/CAC\-6\s+CABLE\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RG-6/CAC-6 CABLE (score: 1): Author: "Magoo" <magoo@isp.ca>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:44:02 -0500; Good stuff to use...loss is low at 1.8 mhz. But make sure it is of the buryable type....this a "flooded" type and contains silicon..."little critters" don't like to chew on it! Someone suggested the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00036.html (6,638 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RG-6/CAC-6 CABLE (score: 1): Author: W5USM@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:06:11 EST; In a message dated 3/4/2004 1:52:23 PM Central Standard Time, magoo@isp.ca writes: Someone suggested the excellent idea of buying cable ends from the cable company. If you must join pieces to get you; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00039.html (6,985 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RG-6/CAC-6 CABLE (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:23:45 -0500; entire I did engineering for a CATV/MATV system owner years ago, and we used mostly F6 drops. F11 (RG-11 size) was used mostly in attics or for small length distribution lines. We almost never used; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00043.html (7,681 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]