Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+re\:hytower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+re\:hytower\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: v31jp@logical123.net (Joe Pontek); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:26:22 -0000; I don't believe anyone mentioned the Hy-Gain product made for the Hy-Tower that used a 40 meter Hy-Gain dipole trap attached at the top of the tower sections (not to the 80 meter vertical stinger) an; /archives//html/Topband/2001-06/msg00002.html (6,881 bytes)
2. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:37:21 -0400; Hi Joe & Topbanders, Yes, making an inverted L by isolating the 40 meter section and extending it works good. Just remember you need to support the wire as high as possible and be able to match the l; /archives//html/Topband/2001-06/msg00003.html (6,793 bytes)
3. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 19:27:32 EDT; I used one on topband for a couple of years. For DX it usually worked better than a dipole at 50'. With the base loading coil to resonate it on 160M, it is still worked on 10, 15, 20, and 40M, but no; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00000.html (8,987 bytes)
4. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:26:35 -0400; Hy-Gain (after the move) still has all the original tooling and parts except for the tower, and MFJ has decided they should look into substituting an aluminum tower from one of the aluminum tower co; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00001.html (7,227 bytes)
5. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: ko5d@swbell.net (John Webb); Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 18:01:20 -0500; Anybody using one on topband??? I would like to keep the 80 mtr capability and the 40 mtr for vertical operation...any thoughts on most efficient 160 operation keeping the 80/40 mtr configuration bes; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00089.html (7,133 bytes)
6. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:04:19 -0400; Hi John, et. al. As to modifying a HyTower, you do not have to use 1/4 wave radials for 160. Just put out all you can as long as you can. To top load it, make the mast heavier or stiffer, so you can; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00090.html (7,777 bytes)
7. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 08:16:37 -0500; I've had good luck using the Hy-Tower on 160, 80, and 40 meters, although most of the time I've been using that antenna with additional tower sections added. As with all antennas the quality of its p; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00091.html (7,706 bytes)
8. Topband: re:hytower (score: 1): Author: Ed Goodman" <n5nug@ix.netcom.com (Ed Goodman); Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:03:11 -0500; Hello John, I have converted several hy-towers to the Uni-Hat CTSVR feed system, which includes a 17' diameter top hat. The top hat assembly is attached as a jpg image. 73, Ed - N5NUG P.S. Attachment; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00092.html (7,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]