Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ EH: 355 ]

Total 355 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole or quarterwavemonopole? (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:23:51 -0500
the antenna, and, assume you run the the "exposed" something coming out The feedline shield exits the antenna at a point with the full potential of the lower tip of the antenna, and that isn't good.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00029.html (10,971 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] Vincent loaded antennas (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:14:47 -0400
please let me know. It about antenna size The report I received from a friend who saw a demo was the "magic" antenna was several S units down from a regular antenna. Sounds about like the EH antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00164.html (8,199 bytes)

183. [TowerTalk] 205BA enhancement? (score: 2)
Author: "Robert Pack (NX5M)" <nx5m@txcyber.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:54:12 -0500
I have read all of the discussions I could find in the archives concerning 205BA's. What is the general consensus as to how to make this antenna a better performer? I have the BA and CA manuals and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00646.html (7,076 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:26:58 -0400
K1TTT posted several references of scholarly and peer-reviewed papers by IEEE showing these spine balls do not work. The polyphaser site at: http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_PEN1021.asp pretty much says
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00902.html (11,235 bytes)

185. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34a Manual Need (score: 2)
Author: "Jim Darrough" <darrougj@onid.orst.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:25:49 -0700
Greetings Blake! Thanks very much! I appreciate your help. This should do the trick. I am hoping that all I need to do is assemble the antenna without the 'XA sections. When I helped my friend take d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00331.html (10,421 bytes)

186. Re: [TowerTalk] Freeway lighting monopoles (score: 2)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:10:22 -0500
Some of the large cellular monopoles, I believe, have an access panel at ground level and an internal ladder to the top. This would mean the diameter would have to stay relatively large even at the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00288.html (10,089 bytes)

187. [TowerTalk] Freeway lighting monopoles (score: 2)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:46:30 -0600
Next time you drive past one notice the access panel at chest height near the ground. I think there's a winch in there where the crew lowers the light head to ground level to perform maintenance. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00287.html (8,634 bytes)

188. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 2)
Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 23:21:51 -0600
How does the OTARD rule apply or not apply to amateur radio antennas possibly even support "structures"? - http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0038.html) - "the FCC extended to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00013.html (14,485 bytes)

189. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 2)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:15:00 -0800
Comments interspersed below many, have Granted, Part 15 says that the manufacturer/operator of the consumer equipment has to deal with it, but in practice, you'd hate to take on all the homeowners in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00005.html (11,512 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] Trap Resonance (score: 2)
Author: "Ron & Madhavi" <mchilkuri@kasnet.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:30:47 -0500
Ooooops! As a new subscriber to this group, I wasn't aware that a debate to this effect had taken place! I appreciate and value ALL the feedback that I have received. One gentleman suggested a parall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00523.html (9,379 bytes)

191. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of Hy-Towers (score: 2)
Author: "Tim Kass" <timkass@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 23:15:43 -0400
Ive got an old original Hytower with somewhat of a modified base from the old Elmer SK that I got it from, WB8AMI, the tower is rated for 75MPH wind survival, if memory serves, and I would expect tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00406.html (11,194 bytes)

192. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of Hy-Towers (score: 2)
Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:50:54 -0400
if memory serves... the tower is actually the smallest gauge of Rohn BX tower... the stamped sheet metal with X cross bracing riveted on it... I would not imagine a six meter beam would be much in th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00405.html (9,484 bytes)

193. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 2)
Author: "Tim Makins, EI8IC" <contesting@eircom.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:43:35 +0100
Its quite normal for the average Joe, used to seeing 8-wheelers on the tarmac, not to have any idea just how heavy these trucks are ! Watch the wheels of one parked up on a verge one day, and you can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00057.html (12,521 bytes)

194. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 2)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:31:30 -0400
Dan... you are not alone... earlier this summer I had nearly the identical situation happen here. The hole turned out much bigger, the concrete truck sank in soft clay AND got stuck between two trees
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00054.html (10,914 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 2)
Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:35:48 EDT
Since you mentioned your antenna, maybe this is a blank check for a towertalk subject- Can you explain more details about the antenna set up and feedlines etc???????? First, check everything at the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00630.html (9,637 bytes)

196. [TowerTalk] The Birds and the Wannabes (Was: Government Study) (score: 2)
Author: Rick Tavan <tavan@tibco.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:37:49 -0700
Well, Don, you see, it's like this: Birds fly up in the air. Towers are up there, too. But towers aren't Natural, they are Human-Made. And that's a terrible problem. I mean, everything that is Human-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00540.html (12,042 bytes)

197. [TowerTalk] Bird Kill Towers? (score: 2)
Author: Bgsalesmel@cs.com
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 00:46:06 EDT
Hi all, I think this "reporter" just had a case of the "what do I write today" blues. But, the one suggestion about "something else" being involved like whales beaching themselves may be closer to fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00772.html (7,875 bytes)

198. [TowerTalk] Neighbors "rights" (score: 2)
Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Thu Aug 14 23:53:28 2003
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:27:59 -0400, "J.P. Kleinhaus" <w2xx@cloud9.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ $20,000 is appalling. I can't believe you paid it. I never woul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00535.html (9,074 bytes)

199. [TowerTalk] Neighbors "rights" (score: 2)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus)
Date: Thu Aug 14 12:31:53 2003
Not at all, it took me $20,000 to get my permit. Do you find that a perfectly reasonable expense to insure that my rights were preserved? Good thing my budget allowed that. I guess radio and towers s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00517.html (9,250 bytes)

200. [TowerTalk] Chicago Tribune: Antenna Stirs Static Among Neighborsfrom N0AH (score: 2)
Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 14 11:02:40 2003
In 1998, I moved to 160 acres in rural Wyoming to pursue my goals in ham radio. Primarily, to earn my 5BDXCC and 5BWAZ while diving into low band sciences. I needed a ton of room and an RF quiet area
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00505.html (9,522 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu