Mail Archive Search: <EH>

Results:

References: [ EH: 355 ]

Total 355 documents matching your query.

341. Need some help Steve (score: 2): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 13:27:40 -0500; << I installed a tower and antennas this past summer. A US Tower HDX-555. <I want a PE to give me the REAL story on capacity with the tower all the way up, all <the way down, half way, third of the w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00500.html (8,362 bytes)
342. Bearing for Pointy-Top Towers (score: 2): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 12:27:13 -0500 (EST); Hi, Dale -- Well, yes, that's what you're supposed to do. The purpose of the thrust bearing is two-fold. First, it takes most of the wind induced side load exerted on the antennas/mast; the side thru; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00322.html (8,449 bytes)
343. PRO-67-C vs. C-4XL/D (score: 2): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:13:00 -0500 (EST); Hi, John -- Thank goodness you decided against the Mosley; their lack of gain and F/B are the big problems. As far as the "specs", you really can't use them for any meaningful comparison. Each manufa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00286.html (9,043 bytes)
344. WEB lookup of magnetic variation... (score: 2): Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ronald D Rossi); Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 13:26:32 -0500; Here is an alternative to finding the right guy/gal to ask at the local airport about the magnetic variation from magnetic north. Try the following url. There are a few options for locating the infor; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00152.html (7,308 bytes)
345. Put that tower up!!!!! (score: 2): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 18:04:28 -0500; Gang, First instance............................. high Second Instance............... Except for getting the persons name in both examples both of these hams are ready to put up their towers! Buildin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00144.html (9,806 bytes)
346. MA40 Part V (Say What!) (score: 2): Author: mbartels@usgs.gov (Mary-frances R Bartels, Computer Specialist, Denver, CO ); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 12:04:05 -0700; --snip-- I've been watching this thread intensely. I have a used ROHN 56 FT 25G tower lying in pieces in my backyard that I purchased this past summer. I live in an unincorporated area, but very much; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00141.html (11,974 bytes)
347. MA40 Part V (Say What!) (score: 2): Author: Spinosa@msn.com (Joe Spinosa); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 96 23:46:38 UT; I've been thrown a real curve here in the 11th hour. Today (11/13/96 -- 3 PM) I decided to call the building department of my town of Concord and start all over again. After a few menu choices, I got; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00128.html (9,638 bytes)
348. Da Birds (score: 2): Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 09:05:39 -0400; what gets me is that the reallly big birds seems to enjoy perching out on the elements rather than on the HD trussed booms a lot of the time.... now you know what they mean be white lightnin', eh mee; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00103.html (7,619 bytes)
349. Rohn HDBX question (score: 2): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 14:43:54 -0400; Hi, Mike -- Pushing the envelope again, eh? Rohn BX-series was designed for TV antennas and lacks the structural design that would make it more useful for ham HF yagi systems. While the HDBX (heavy-d; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00066.html (9,671 bytes)
350. Safe Roof Climbing (score: 2): Author: JKAHRS@delphi.com (JKAHRS@delphi.com); Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 23:00:08 -0500 (EST); On 22-AUG-1996 14:38:35.7 K7LXC said to JKAHRS <BIG snip> As the retired Exec VP of the corporation that cleared the unexploded ordnance out of the American Sector of Kuwait after the Gulf War, I can; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00215.html (7,306 bytes)
351. Recap of "raising top of cement tower base" (LONG) (score: 2): Author: dave@egh.com (David Clemons); Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 13:42:14 -0400; Dale KG5U requested an recap of the answers to this question. Perhaps it will also be of interest to others. -- I've got the same problem on some steps going down to my basement. The concrete wasn't; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00096.html (11,534 bytes)
352. raising top of cement tower base (score: 2): Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 21:59:42 -0400; well, some guys just have really lame concrete pours for bases...you as someone looking to enhance your concrete pour sound like you are "going professional" Depending on how professional you want to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00000.html (8,728 bytes)
353. Goodbye trapped antennas? (score: 2): Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 17:53:54 -0400; << I can't help myself. . . I have this image of you performing antenna experiments standing on the vibrating bed at the No Tell Motel with a plate of pasta in one hand and a yagi in the other. . . I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00048.html (9,680 bytes)
354. Hot Antennas (score: 2): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Thu, 04 Jul 1996 01:08:16 GMT; -- This can't be true. If it were, every connector in my shack would be too hot to touch when I'm running the legal limit. In reality, even on 10 meters running RTTY at 1500 watts, the UHF-type conne; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00030.html (7,566 bytes)
355. Hot Antennas (score: 2): Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel); Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:05:28 -0400 (EDT); It's really not that hard to understand. Let's boil down the math for a simple loss budget for a connection made with a ham-type UHF connector. Loss per connector = 0.05 dB (doesn't seem like much,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00024.html (7,589 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 355
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]