Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Barockteer@aol.com: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Problems with the KT36XA (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:25:19 -0500
Bill The fact that 10 is 'sort of' OK implies that the innermost trap is working properly, isolating each element from the end sections. 'sort of' is a bit worrisome, in that it probably only takes o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00422.html (8,965 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Off-topic -- Pro III CW issues (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:01:48 -0500
Don't have a Pro3, but... On the Pros, turning on some NR will help the popping. Unfortunately, the effect goes away within 15 seconds on the Pro and Pro2. I hear it will persist on the Pro3, so turn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00370.html (6,982 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34A M2 Upgrade 15 meters Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:53:48 -0400
I have tried modelling this beast, and can get reasonable numbers, but I don't really trust the connection between the model and the real world, due to the trap design. Most modelling programs cannot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00478.html (19,099 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34A M2 Upgrade 15 meters Issue (score: 1)
Author: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:56:23 -0400
I also measured resonances of the elements a long time ago. Here are my numbers, which are slightly different from KLM's. The results of such measurements are variable depending on your technique. -T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00479.html (8,621 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] XM-240 Tuning Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 08:49:40 -0400
Any other antennas around? I have a KT-36XA 9 feet above my 40-2CD on a separate rotator. When the Boom of the XA is parallel to the elements of the 40-2CD ( 90 degree firning direction offset) I see
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00078.html (7,830 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Detuning Booms ... (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:41:49 -0400
Well, I had really hoped to be able to share a success story about detuning booms, but unfortunately all I can report is a 'result'... Situation: KT-36XA at 80 feet, 8 feet above a 40-2CD on a swingi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00412.html (8,083 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (score: 1)
Author: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:38:44 -0400
The K7LXC Tribander Comparison study was excellent; however, the particular KT-34XA they used had some sort of flaw, as the SWR curves were out of line with the manufacturer's published curves. (This
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00633.html (6,676 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (really long) (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:03:38 -0400
The issue of lossy traps is only one of a number of factors that enter into antenna comparison and selection. The real question is which antenna is best for you? And of course, there is no simple or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00636.html (17,232 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (long) (score: 1)
Author: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:43 -0400
I submitted this last night but it didn't post, so I have attempted to shorten it some more. My apologies if it is a double post. The issue of lossy traps is only one of a number of factors that ente
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00638.html (14,978 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Trap Loss (score: 1)
Author: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:32:27 -0400
Let me respond to Julio and Mike's valid points by clarifying a few things: I've owned two KT-34XAs of the KLM design, and one KT-36XA of the M2 design. The KLM designs typically required rebuilds ev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00667.html (8,926 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 3 or 4 el ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:14:43 -0500
...depends on where you are on the db/$ curve! If you have already made sure you have the full legal limit output power for your country, and you have the best receiver you can afford, then you have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00030.html (7,488 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m delta loop question (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:02:17 -0500
I have a pair of vertically polarized delta loops on 80, fed as a parasitic array with one reflector. The impedance of each loop is around 100 ohms, so if the feedline length is not really long, I su
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00205.html (7,853 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Low-Band Rx Antenna vs. 4-square? (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:40:29 -0500
I have a question which needs to be answered to figure out some filtering/switching schemes. Would a low-band directional receive antenna, such as a Beverage or a Flag/Pennant, ever be better on rece
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00761.html (7,602 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] This Company's LMR-400 Equiv. (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:00:38 -0500
I bought 100' of the Jefa 400 cable through eBay. The polyethelyne jacket is a bit stiffer than 9913. The loss is as quoted, measured using my miniVNA. Preparing the ends for soldering is a bit diffi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00344.html (7,810 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] correcting a stupid mistake (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:15:27 -0400
The only real problem I see is if the upward angled elements could collect water inside, maybe freeze and split...? -Tony, K1KP _______________________________________________ _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00655.html (7,528 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] help w/ KT34XA (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:41:57 -0400
Use the shortest possible leads you can to make the connection. -Tony, K1KP _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00817.html (6,956 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Guy Anchor Inspection (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:01:20 -0400
As one of those things I was going to do when I got a 'Round Tuit', today I started inspecting my guy anchor rods. (Tower is 78' Rohn 45G, three guy levels; installation 16 years old). I excavated th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00137.html (7,942 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] guy lines? & photos (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:38:11 -0400
Paul Looks like a fairly spindly pole. I would be concerned that adding guys would increase the compressive load in the pole, which might cause it to bend out of column and fail. I would think that t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00003.html (7,050 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:03:19 -0400
I just modeled nearly the same situation - a 40-2CD 10 feet under a KT34XA. I found that at this close spacing, forward gain on the XA on 20 was down ~1.5 dB. High angle rearward nulls get filled in.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00490.html (7,337 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:24:54 -0400
Actually, this model has benn floating around for quite some time - I don't claim to have created it. Someone measured the loading coil inductance and posted it. I'm using NEC2. I don't claim it's a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00527.html (8,063 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu