Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Hamforever@aol.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. EMT used as mast...NO! (score: 1)
Author: Hamforever@aol.com (Hamforever@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 15:36:34 -0400
I agree that the thin wall EMT is not suitable for masts to support beam antennae. The galvanizing disappears within two years and the masts fail shortly thereafter in our south Louisiana wx. 73 de J
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00067.html (6,881 bytes)

2. Glenn Martin Hazer Use Query (score: 1)
Author: Hamforever@aol.com (Hamforever@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 22:23:26 -0400
I use the hazer on a 50 ft. tower with guys attached to the hazer with no problems for four years. I have a 2 element 40 meter beam and an A3 Cushcraft mounted on the hazer. Why mount the guys to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00244.html (6,992 bytes)

3. Rohn 55 vs 45 vs 25 (score: 1)
Author: Hamforever@aol.com (Hamforever@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:05:50 -0400
Dave, I don't understand your statement about the climbing belt getting past the bolts on two legs instead of three. Do you climb with the waist belt looped around the tower? How does climbing with y
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00002.html (6,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu