Mail Archive Search: <+from:JC_Smith@designlink.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:JC_Smith@designlink.com: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] personal property rights (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 22:43:51 GMT; == snip == prb does nothing in my opinion/experience ....i fought a 3yr battle and lost a lot of time and money.......i moved. a lot of the trouble we find ourselves in can be traced to 40 years of l; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00657.html (7,299 bytes)
42. [TowerTalk] Opinions on U.S. Towers Tubulars (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 08:57:35 GMT; Steve, In your reply to Dick you say that a crank up tower can make the permit process more difficult. I'm wondering why? In my community they are looked on as no different than a fixed tower at thei; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00674.html (8,989 bytes)
43. [TowerTalk] All-stainless clamps (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 09:36:31 GMT; magnetic? Yes, there are different grades of stainless and some are "more stainless" than others. We use these things by the truckload in our industry and have found a very good brand to be Norton.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00677.html (7,622 bytes)
44. [TowerTalk] All-stainless clamps (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 09:44:03 GMT; Just a quick follow up. Go over to the tool section and borrow some magnetic tool. Test the clamps with it. A good "all stainless" clamp will not be attracted to the magnet AT ALL. 73 - JC,k0hps@ams; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00678.html (7,483 bytes)
45. [TowerTalk] Opinions on U.S. Towers Tubulars (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 11:29:49 GMT; That's the way it is around here. That 50 mph is going to have to change. The 1991 UBC used tables based on a 50 mph wind speed, but the new 1994 UBC used tables based on 70 mph winds. I just ran int; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00683.html (12,129 bytes)
46. [TowerTalk] MARC question (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 12:25:38 GMT; Hi Steve, I've been having fun playing with the MARC software, trying all sort of what-if situations. Nice program, thanks (& your check is in the mail). I assume antennas can be added to the databas; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00744.html (10,829 bytes)
47. [TowerTalk] MARC question (more info.) (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith) (JC Smith); Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 15:55:57 GMT; I have a bit more information on that US Tower M-20R mast. It is made from HREW (Hot Rolled Electric Weld) 10-10 Carbon steel. It has a yield strength of 36,000 psi for the outer section and 36,000 p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00749.html (7,502 bytes)
48. [TowerTalk] Scarborough Reef news (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 04 Apr 1997 04:18:04 GMT; This sounds just like something the PRC would do. Peoples Republic of California, that is. SCARBOROUGH REEF New Britain, CT, Apr 1--In a surprise decision made earlier today by the Ministry of Radio,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00112.html (8,269 bytes)
49. [TowerTalk] Information needed (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC_Smith@designlink.com); Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 21:45:54 GMT; Basic rule of dealing with government: NEVER involve government unless absolutely necessary. ("Absolutely necessary" can be loosely defined as when an agent of the government is staning in your way; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00908.html (8,038 bytes)
50. [TowerTalk] CC&R's (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC_Smith@designlink.com); Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:01:32 GMT; Man, whoever wrote this stuff (see below) must be a glutton for punishment. In any case, Terry's original question seemed to be about documents to check BEFORE buying the house, not what he will need; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00945.html (16,646 bytes)
51. [TowerTalk] Stacked TH-11 and 40-2CD Spacing and Interactions? (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC_Smith@designlink.com); Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:50:16 GMT; I remember hearing somewhere (the infamous "somewhere") that the 40-2CD has a secondary resonance around 18 MHz. Can anyone verify this? If this is true, am I setting myself up for an interaction pro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00948.html (8,129 bytes)
52. [TowerTalk] tower damage / insurance question (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC_Smith@designlink.com); Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 20:25:22 GMT; == snip == My tower was damaged by a truck delivering gravel (one guy and 2m antenna in the top.) Their insurance wants to prorate the years I owned the tower over the useful live of the installation; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00954.html (8,364 bytes)
53. [TowerTalk] e-mail address for WR9R (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 01 Mar 1997 12:29:53 GMT; OOPS, I screwed up. In a recent post I asked: Should have said WR6R, or WR6R/KH6. I also heard Al may have a new HI call. Still looking. Thanks. JC, k0hps@amsat.org -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00009.html (6,309 bytes)
54. [TowerTalk] Torque absorver PTA1 (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 13 Mar 1997 08:21:15 GMT; Steve, does Tower Tech carry Dave's book? (chance for a plug here) 73 - JC,k0hps@amsat.org -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administra; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00177.html (7,107 bytes)
55. [TowerTalk] 2 SPACED DIPOLES FOR 80. (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 13 Mar 1997 09:59:36 GMT; Wow, great idea for a field day antenna. If you have tried or modeled this one please reply to the group as well as to Carlos. Carlos Augusto S. Pereira asked: Two dipoles at 10m, one being the direc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00180.html (7,578 bytes)
56. [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling Programs (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 15 Mar 1997 15:06:15 GMT; Interesting. I wonder why it is that there does seem to be a diffeence when the wire is being used as the center conductor in coax cable. Eg: the difference in performance between LMR-400 and LMR-40; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00205.html (9,483 bytes)
57. [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling Programs (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 15 Mar 1997 18:45:57 GMT; when but 19 goes LB, thanks for replying. This is logical, and easy to see. What I don't understand is why this gives lower losses. I thought you got lower losses by increasing the surface area. (Ye; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00210.html (9,373 bytes)
58. [TowerTalk] Amidon UNUNs (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 17 Mar 1997 17:20:25 GMT; beginning Hey, $50 for 500' of direct bury cable, and you didn't vote for Mr. Bill... you sound like a pretty smart guy to me, Sam. Happy St. Pat's Day, JC,k0hps@amsat.org -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00235.html (7,310 bytes)
59. [TowerTalk] TH7DX INFO (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 19 Mar 1997 00:40:48 GMT; Hi Carlos, I've managed to misplace my Mosley book, but here are the specs. on the TH7DX: Band: 20m 15m 10m <2:1VSWR 14.0 - 14.35 21.0 - 21.45 28.0 - 29.7 <1.5:1 VSWR 14.07 - 14.33 21.18 - 21.45 28.6; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00265.html (8,094 bytes)
60. [TowerTalk] Re: Again OWL,BIRDS & Antenna Video (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 19 Mar 1997 01:26:06 GMT; Never had much luck with any type of "scarecrow" and although the trained falcon idea sounds interesting, that could turn into a whole new hobby, and I hear the permits are hard to get. At our QTH we; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00266.html (8,498 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]