Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KD0RII@web-pub.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Control Cable (score: 1)
Author: KD0RII <KD0RII@web-pub.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 19:00:19 -0500
As you can see from the area of the conductor from the chart below, your examples are actually understated, and your conclusion is faulty. Two #18 will give you almost a #12 capacity, rather than #15
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00264.html (11,746 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Control Cable (correction) (score: 1)
Author: KD0RII <KD0RII@web-pub.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 23:56:36 -0500
Whoops! My Bad. I used the formula for circumference instead of area. My mistake, corrected areas below show that your numbers are accurate. Sorry about that. AWG Di. in. Di. mm ohms/1kFt. ohms/km (1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00278.html (13,697 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground question (score: 1)
Author: KD0RII <KD0RII@web-pub.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 12:17:30 -0500
Why are you burying the radials?  Their length has to do with the frequency you're using.  They don't necessarily have to be straight. 73 de George, KD0RII On 5/10/2018 16:16, k7lxc-- via TowerTalk w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-05/msg00107.html (9,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu