Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KY5G@montac.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25g unguyed height (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:34:24 -0500
Wow!  I'm with you on that one...  I was simply showing that Rohn requires 2 brackets to use the data on their table...  And there's a 0.6 derate if not all the elements are round! Sounds like someon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00440.html (9,330 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower MA40 Questions (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:57:44 -0500
IF you are going to move up to a crank down, tilt-over, give SERIOUS consideration to a til-down aluminum tower.  HIGHLY recommend Heights Tilt-Down towers....  no crank down...  no cables....  They
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00462.html (8,489 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Terry's Tiltover (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:05:48 -0500
You ever actually laid eyes on the ACME Screw system they use?  I have.  I've disassembled and reassembled one in detail.  I've watched it in use, up close. It is as close to bulletproof as one can g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00474.html (8,489 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:08:32 -0500
Reasonably priced is all relative.... I use TESSCO and in a pinch Pasternack.  Pasternack, in general, has an excellent selection/availability, but is considerably more expensive.  I consider Pastern
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00475.html (8,611 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Terry's Tiltover (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:33:55 -0500
Key word: overloaded. Any tower can fail if it is overloaded. Any tower may fail if it is forced to perform outside its specified engineering limits. 72 feet is 12 feet more than my tower and I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00478.html (9,869 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Terry's Tiltover (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:02:10 -0500
If they were broken, the the previous owners were morons that did something REALLY stupid.  Because IF you have the right screw for the right tower, the screw has a LOT of performance margin. You DO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00490.html (9,535 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Mot R36 related to NUMBER of installed ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:14:16 -0500
Simple answer... you can't.  There is an Appendix in R56 that details how you measure your system to insure you meet whatever standard you set for yourself. It would appear that the equipment for the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00050.html (9,026 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Mot R36 related to NUMBER of installed ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:22:47 -0500
Mmmmm.... the speed of light is REALLY REALLY REALLY fast...  The speed of current through big copper is still REALLY fast...  50 feet?  Nah....  Rise time and duration for WHICH part of the strike e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00062.html (14,210 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Mot R36 related to NUMBER of installed ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:16:39 -0500
Reply inline.... On 11/3/2017 2:21 PM, jimlux wrote: the speed is slower than you think.. one way is to think of it as a wire immersed in a dielectric, for which the speed will be sqrt(epsilon).. if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00070.html (15,017 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Mot R36 related to NUMBER of installed ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 10:25:03 -0500
Link es no bueno....  no worky! Could you check it?  <smile> 73, Clay, KY5G www.electricalpartmanuals.com/pdf/miscellaneous/Biddle%20Instruments/.../25TA.pdf _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00085.html (9,473 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:25:27 -0600
Again....  Times makes 3 part numbers that are solid copper, prfe dielectric, no steel.... Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message --From: Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00128.html (10,535 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Sheave source wanted for Rohn EF2545 erection fixture (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:30:20 -0600
I'd rengineer it to use a quality stainless sheave with a proper bearing, et al. Start with the size/type of line/load required and work out. Search for and contact marine supply places, et al. -- Or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00148.html (9,664 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Sheave source wanted for Rohn EF2545 erection fixture (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:34:41 -0600
Excellent suggestion....  consider a proper bronxe bushind with matching shaft/fastener, and if there's enough material, consider machining for an actual bearing....  altgough likely not enough. I'm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00149.html (11,551 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Sheave source wanted for Rohn EF2545 erection fixture (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:38:24 -0600
This is what I'm talking about.  Properly sized for max load plus 50% at least.  Less friction and will last a long time. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone It is amazing how much lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00150.html (11,919 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Square Hole or Round Hole for Self Supporter? (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 14:05:14 -0600
My tower actually calls for a cylindrical hole... The hole should be engineered to support the load.  Mine is 4 foot diameter x 8 foot deep. Depth is generally more important than area beyond footpri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00172.html (9,083 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Pulling coax through PVC pipe (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 12:16:39 -0600
Is the entire PVC run still clean and more importantly, dry? Do you just want to replace the coax or both the coax and 14-2? Where are you?  City/State.  In city or out in county? For a run that long
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00270.html (9,874 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor bolts? (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:34:19 -0500
Here, here, Jim. I, too, am raising my 65' Heights tilt-over tower on a residential lot.  Granted my setup is mostly aluminum and much lighter, AND I have all the engineering designs/math for the fou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-03/msg00219.html (7,484 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing station ground (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 18:16:36 -0500
My FULL R56 manual has a 09/05/2005 date on it. If someone has a link a newer version, please post it up. 73, ______________________ Clay Autery, KY5G (318) 518-1389 There is a new version of the Mot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-05/msg00222.html (8,454 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Putting up wire antennas with a drone? (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 14:40:25 -0500
Variations on a theme, I know, but if you want to avoid having to re-shoot a line into a tree OR hiring a tree climber pretty much ever again... at least minimize the chances, you might want to consi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-06/msg00064.html (19,671 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] screen shot (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 01:22:02 -0500
"snip" Type it into the Start--> Run field.... ______________________ Clay Autery, KY5G (318) 518-1389 Bill KH7XS _______________________________________________ _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00006.html (7,157 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu