Mail Archive Search: <+from:N0OEL@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:N0OEL@aol.com: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Wind Indicator brings trouble to River City? (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 22:38:29 EDT; I read Steve K7LXC's report on Vasalia with great interest. Its one of those historic amateur radio conferences I dream of attending some day. Thanks for the intersting review of the new stuff around; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00159.html (8,676 bytes)
82. [TowerTalk] CDE Ham IV-Nope! (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 08:43:32 EST; CDE has not made Ham rotors since the Ham-M, as I recall. In fact Hy Gain has made the Ham II, Ham III, and Ham IV, not CDE or CDR. Not a big deal but just wanted to make sure we are all talking abou; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00063.html (7,060 bytes)
83. [TowerTalk] HyGain Yep! (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 18:45:49 EST; Hygain bought out CDE "a few years back"......over 20 years ago!!!! Ham M has pot metal in the ring gear and the Ham IV stainless steel. The Ham M had a much smaller brake. Lots of difference I am af; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00085.html (6,707 bytes)
84. [TowerTalk] 12 & 17 meters (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 16:19:34 EDT; I am using the Cushcraft D3W rotatable diapole mounted 7 feet above my low band beam and it works great on 12 and 17. The recommendation is that you keep it at least 5 ft and preferably 10 ft above a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00707.html (8,307 bytes)
85. [TowerTalk] 12 & 17 meters (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 23:49:07 EDT; Hi Charles. "Get a TH-7 or TH-11 and relax." I had no idea that the TH-7 goes on 17 and 12 mtrs. Really? I thought it was a 10-15 and 20 mtr antenna. If our friend mounts his rotatable diapole 7 feet; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00777.html (7,655 bytes)
86. [TowerTalk] TH-6 maybe (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 00:11:13 EDT; Phone number for Hy Gain is 402-467-5321. E-mail is hygain@telex.com Contact: Roger!!! The TH-6 did not have small traps so your description puzzles me. And did you know you can by an upgrade kit (39; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00779.html (6,965 bytes)
87. [TowerTalk] Butterfly Beams (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 20:20:48 EST; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_886728049_boundary Content-ID: <0_886728049@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I am quite familiar with the Butte; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00186.html (10,374 bytes)
88. [TowerTalk] tower tilter (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:08:51 EST; Hi Lon. I have been using Universal Towers for 28 years. I have put up several for others. I have moved my Universal Tower to two other homes. I have always tipped it just for initial installation an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00282.html (8,396 bytes)
89. [TowerTalk] Cinch Jones Disappearing Forever??? (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 22:08:21 EST; I was shocked to learn this week that my old reliable connectors, the Cinch Jones connecotrs, are getting hard to find. My local electronic parts store was out (they have doubled the price in recent; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00475.html (8,516 bytes)
90. [TowerTalk] Cinch-Jones Answered (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 21:55:14 EST; I want to thank all those that game me leads on Cinch Jones plugs. I think Newark wins the prize as the most mentioned source. I appreciate all of your help. But, as you may recall, I did mention tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00512.html (7,446 bytes)
91. Fwd: [TowerTalk] RF in neighbor speaker ! (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 22:56:03 -0400 (EDT); Getting RF out of stereos is usually easier than getting it out of TV's. I have found, through experience in my own home and others, that a great deal of the interference in speakers systems for ster; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00106.html (10,396 bytes)
92. [TowerTalk] Beam in the Big Wind! (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 22:22:08 -0400 (EDT); I have asked Dick's Green's question many times of the experts: best to leave the side of the beam to the wind or the front of the beam pointing into the wind? Answer: Lots of various opinions on tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00306.html (7,407 bytes)
93. [TowerTalk] . (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 23:12:01 -0400 (EDT); auth a03e0a76subscribetowertalk n0oel@aol.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00707.html (6,521 bytes)
94. [TowerTalk] TVI Filters (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 23:39:48 -0400 (EDT); In response to Richard, N7TR I suggest the following when trying to get rid of a TVI problem with neighbors. First, inform your neighbor you are concerned about the problem but often it is not your f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00730.html (8,660 bytes)
95. [TowerTalk] Roof towers, tripods, etc. (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:46:13 -0400 (EDT); I read with interest the comments on roof mounted towers, tripods and all that. Please be aware that they put tremendious straing on roofs and in some communities you cannot get a building permit for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00843.html (7,498 bytes)
96. [TowerTalk] Favorite Tribander (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:06:39 -0400 (EDT); I have been reading Towertalk for a long time and have heard about lots of beams. Asking someone what kind of beam one likes best like Frank, W0CECS, mentioned is like asking someone what is the best; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00845.html (8,018 bytes)
97. Re: [TowerTalk] 40/80M wire antenna (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:29:21 EST; "Traps have gone the way of the dinosaurs" You really mean that? Dont tell Spiro that! Mine work great! -Mike S K0BUD _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00130.html (7,432 bytes)
98. Re: [TowerTalk] ? AMERITRON REMOTE COAX SWITCH (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 19:11:55 EDT; I have three of the RCS8 switches and one of them in service for 15 years. Not one problem. They dont look like they will last long but talk about great performance. I have two ganged for more than t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00012.html (7,683 bytes)
99. Re: [TowerTalk] SHACK LOCATION VS GROUNDING & RFI (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:16:48 EST; "would say the most important thing in deciding where to put your station is where you would enjoy it most. Second, you have to consider where the antennas are located and what the antennas are. You; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00149.html (8,152 bytes)
100. Re: [TowerTalk] Create Rotors??? (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 23:38:34 EDT; I have a Create with 12 sq ft of windload on it including a Exp 14. Been in the air for 8 years. Not a problem. Must be doing something right! -Mike K0BUD Minneapolis ________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00119.html (6,993 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]