Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RXDesign@ssvecnet.com: 303 ]

Total 303 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] lightning and insulated elements.. (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:08:30 -0700
has there been any previous discussion on the merits (or lack thereof) of insulated elements visa vie lightning? I recently installed a tower system will 5 f12 antennas - all having insulated element
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00133.html (7,264 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:41:51 -0700
Not trying to incur the wrath of the SteppIR owners out there.... I know there are those that complain loudly about f12 and their lack of support via email... but I have sent THREE mails to SteppIR a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00411.html (7,244 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Stacked KT34XA's vs The Competition? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:31:50 -0700
I have three f12 C31XR's here - up since Dec of last year. Not that it is anything spectacular but in 11 weeks I have managed to work over 200 countries from out here in AZ (no contests included) - n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00586.html (8,707 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacked KT34XA's vs The Competition? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:11:05 -0700
I wonder if he had the phasing wrong?! Again - the difference is HEIGHT - not gain! I have heard of people that have stacked the C3's and have had excellent results even though they only have 2 eleme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00597.html (9,739 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] Hill Communications (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 19:56:18 -0700
I bought my tower from them last year - the lowest price on R45... and bought it from them in the 80's as well ... great service both times. g. K9RX _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00117.html (6,387 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] Wireless ISP on Ham tower (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:49:33 -0700
I have a wireless router/network system in the house and it is TERRIBLE for noise on the bands. Birdies all over the place. I have yet to solve this problem (have not put too much effort into it as m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00037.html (6,525 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireless ISP on Ham tower (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:22:56 -0700
Thanks - I realized that (it is not the main xmit freq) but did not say that in my posting. The mention of the frequency was more to id the "types" of boxes that are in use. Its amazing how much WE h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00045.html (8,327 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] D3W question (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:47:00 -0700
I recently bought one of these WARC dipoles and have tested it at about 25' (more than enough)... the SWR on 17 M is high - no lower than about 1.7:1. Is anyone else seeing this? Should I expect lowe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00109.html (6,451 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] Autek WM1 question (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:52:44 -0700
Hello... I have an Autek WM1 wattmeter and just received a new LP100 digital wattmeter. They are not reading the same and I want to assume the WM1 is the one that is off since the LP100 was calibrate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00167.html (6,846 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] interaction problem... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:14:14 -0700
I have a stack of C31's up - top at 121 then 81'/41'. They work great on 20 and 15... and I had believed on 10 as well... but recently I installed a simple D3W warc dipole on the side of the tower ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00680.html (8,330 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] interaction... continued (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:16:52 -0700
I just ran a test with my neighbor who is ~ 1/2 mile away. I had him turn his antenna away and xmit at his lowest power. I then compared the 2 (WARC dipole and the array) and found the dipole to be o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00681.html (7,213 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] interaction... continued (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:21:18 -0700
...and it has about 8 db FB! So... anyone think it is the dipole that is doing this? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00682.html (6,358 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] interaction... continued (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:07:46 -0700
"remove dipole" sorry - habit... name is Gary, signed 'g.' and the call is K9RX. Unfortunately I have a severe fear of heights so I can't easily pull the dipole out - and it is very difficult, actual
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00686.html (8,274 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] interaction problem... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:10:56 -0700
David, Thanks for running this.... however what I am seeing is, much more often than not, the dipole is only about 8 db below the array - and at times almost equal ... this is not quite within your r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00698.html (10,637 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Which would you use? DxLab, (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:09:29 -0700
try CommCAT... works very well. g. K9RX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00141.html (6,339 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] Seperation? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:24:00 -0700
Steve, I will be out there helping you with Pauls install - at least for a day.... I have my 80 F12 dipole (the same one Paul got) separated by 16' from the 20 antenna (the one to be worried about pe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00154.html (7,704 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Antenna Software... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:09:07 -0700
I know there is an antenna group as well - I will post there also but I believe some here are able to respond to my questions... I was wondering - is there anything that prevents one from designing a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00225.html (7,750 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Guy breakup at tower... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:21:11 -0700
Re: my previous post on having interaction with the 6' lengths of EHS at the tower (through the tower it is actually ~13.5') ... it does interact with BOTH 10 and 15 - probably slightly more on 15 th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00292.html (8,170 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 Sigma 180 80M dipole (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:28:52 -0700
Steve, I would bet your not expanding the coil far enough. Mine was expanded to the point that the end of the coil itself was OUTSIDE the connection point! In other words the distance from one connec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00025.html (8,911 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] SteppIR for C31XR (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:37:31 -0700
I have 3 C31's in a stack... they work quite well I must say. I have low vswr on all 3 (well when I don't have interactions on 10 and 15 from the guys)... I have never had a Steppir so I cannot comme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00133.html (8,590 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu