- 1. 40/80 Meter Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: tr19@chrysler.com (tr19@chrysler.com)
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 18:32:36 -0500
- look into the new MFJ 80/40 vertical. It is full size on 40M, has a 40M trap, and top hat loading for 80M. This antenna looks like the most efficient design on the market for 80/40M. The HF2v is base
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00226.html (8,324 bytes)
- 2. 160 METER VERTICAL (score: 1)
- Author: tr19@chrysler.com (tr19@chrysler.com)
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 17:35:24 -0500
- As Steve suggested, BUY MORE Rohn 25. Coupling into tapered sections is inefficient and produces little added loading. It is best to maintain a constant diameter. Or, USE TOP LOADING. Loading wires c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00380.html (7,184 bytes)
- 3. Non-Rohn Tower (score: 1)
- Author: TR19@chrysler.com (TR19@chrysler.com)
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 96 17:14:27 EDT
- ** Reply to note of 10/04/96 11:37 I HAVE 130 FT OF THE SO CALLED ROHN "35" TOWER. I LOVE IT! YOU CAN PUT A ROTOR ANYWHERE WITHOUT CUTTING DIAGONALS AND IT IS STIFFER THAN 25. THE LEGS ARE THE SAME A
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00049.html (7,159 bytes)
- 4. 40-2CD proximity to 20-4CD (score: 1)
- Author: TR19@chrysler.com (TR19@chrysler.com)
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 96 13:11:35 EDT
- ** Reply to note of 10/14/96 13:50 MANY YEARS AGO, I GAMMA MATCHED THE BOOM OF A 3 ELEMENT TELREX 20M BEAM ON A 24 FT BOOM AS A ROTARY DIPOLE ON 40M. WORKS GREAT. I BELIEVE THE BOOM PLUS END ELEMENTS
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00178.html (7,348 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu