- 1. [TowerTalk] Is Cubex still in business? (score: 1)
- Author: W0WOI@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:12:36 EDT
- Anyone have contact with the company in the past three weeks? Would also like to talk off reflector with anyone have actual 6-meter quad experience. Thank you. _______________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00503.html (6,390 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Cubex (score: 1)
- Author: W0WOI@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:31:12 EDT
- A number of responses have been received, consensus is Cubex has not responded to any communication within at least the past month. Thank you and end thread. 73 de bill ______________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00504.html (6,261 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] More about CUBEX ... (score: 1)
- Author: W0WOI@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:30:24 EDT
- Thanks to Tom, KE7VUX, how-to-contact CUBEX is solved. The ONLY telephone number at which to reach a person is: 616.622.4968 And the ONLY E-mail address is: _tennadyne@tennadyne.com_ (mailto:tennadyn
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00509.html (6,982 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Polarization: Quad vs Horizontal at 50 mHz (score: 1)
- Author: W0WOI@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:45:58 EST
- If Station A is using a traditional horizontal Yagi in contact with Station B using a horizontal Yagi, via 50 mHz Sporadic Es or some form of F-layer propagation, either single or multiple hop, does
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00100.html (6,984 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Stacking Quad Antennas ... (score: 1)
- Author: W0WOI@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:59:24 EST
- Would be interested to hear from anyone who has used stacked (side-by-side) cubical quad antennas on 50 or 144 mHz, specifically the "rule-of-thumb" spacing distance of their respective booms.. Off r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00242.html (6,584 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu