Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ai.egrps@gmail.com: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:37:10 -0400
Only if you mount the cage dipole in free space! Any dipole mounted somewhere above a good ground, could have some gain in some directions ... compared to a dipole in free space ... and so it would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00370.html (9,448 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:57:58 -0400
But that is EXACTLY what it means!!! Anything else is inexact science, not even science, and would require a disclaimer that all numbers have an error tolerance of +/- 10 dB or so because we don't r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00378.html (11,036 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] New 259B Analyzer.... need Elmer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:10:49 -0400
That raised rim is a recent addition. Most don't have it. The blank plug addresses the problem of accidentally turning it on when you store it, which was/is a frequent problem. As far as I know, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00437.html (8,202 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Franklin County tower ordinance (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:42:14 -0400
The original Appendix F that this one replaces, apparently was adopted in Dec. 2000 and became effective Jan. 1, 2001. You can find the original one, currently in effect, at http://www.franklinmo.org
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00674.html (9,157 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ladderline. What Kind ? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:31:43 -0400
Also search for open wire lines. How much does the exact impedance mean to you? Do you have a 450.0 ohm antenna on the end of your line? One of the advantages of ladder/open wire line is it tolerate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00685.html (8,700 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 76, Issue 83 Franklin Co ordinance (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:32:37 -0400
Since 2005?? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00686.html (7,187 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Trifilar Winding Question (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:09:02 -0400
The characteristic impedance is dependent on how the cable is used ... which wires are signal, and which ground. For example, G-S-S-G is different than a G-S-G-S-G configuration. Not having done a t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00378.html (8,344 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Balanced Feedline for Ground Mounted Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:56:18 -0400
Just another data point ... I believe it is standard for AM broadcast stations to match the tower to the feedline right at the base of each tower, even with their monster coax or when they had balanc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00439.html (9,338 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Balanced Feedline for Ground Mounted Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:42:27 -0400
The (old, no longer used) feedline I saw, I'm pretty sure was balanced. It had just two wires, with pairs of glass insulators. If they had been unbalanced in that arrangement, I think it would have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00464.html (8,973 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Balanced Feedline for Ground Mounted Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:13:04 -0400
So why do those KFBK towers use unbalanced feedlines? As center-fed antennas, wouldn't the feedpoints be essentially balanced? Andy _______________________________________________ __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00477.html (8,581 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Power Pole (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:04:29 -0400
There is an array not far from here of about a dozen tall wooden poles, visible from a mile or two. I've read that it supports a Sterba array. Sorry I don't know the operator's call off-hand (now in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00071.html (7,396 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Power Pole (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:34:15 -0400
The one near me is W1EVT. Some claim he got funding from the government when he built it, because it was useful for locating precise directions of foreign signals in the early Cold War. (I don't know
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00111.html (8,738 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] And we wonder why people fall and die... (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:17:53 -0400
He reminds me a bit of Edwin Armstrong on towers. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00042.html (8,207 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Tesla's birthday (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:43:21 -0400
I've been looking at that logo all day today. Can't figure out what that fan thing is supposed to be. What is it? _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00155.html (7,416 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Tesla's birthday (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:14:59 -0400
I guess I wasn't clear in my question yesterday. Yes, I know about Tesla coils. And I understand how the corona in the "oo" and the part that makes the top of the "g" are representative of a Tesla co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00159.html (7,749 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] World's toughest fixes - 2000' tower (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:10:49 -0400
The exterior of the John Hancock tower is mostly glass. Pittsburgh Glass supplied the glass. They knew the windows wouldn't survive, they told the architects they wouldn't work, but they insisted on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00361.html (10,681 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Tall masts and buildings (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:47:18 -0400
Ahh, you mean "the building formerly known as the Sears Tower". I do not understand the need to rename everything. But I suspect this one might always be known as the Sears Tower, in spite of its la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00365.html (7,083 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Slightly OT Lightning Rods (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:40 -0400
I'm surprised there hasn't been more response, so I'll throw in mine. Take mine with a grain of salt. The lightning rods and wiring ought to be done according to your local codes / national code, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00582.html (8,199 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Slightly OT Lightning Rods (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:28:04 -0400
Sign up here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LightningProtection/ I will mention that it is a tightly moderated group. The moderators may answer questions directly to you without your email making it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00592.html (8,092 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Resonance is over rated (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 23:37:23 -0400
the That is true of the total net reactance. Antennas in general do have both, distributed along their elements; as do tuned circuits; but when you look at the terminals, you see only the net reacta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00124.html (8,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu