Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:alwilliams@olywa.net: 335 ]

Total 335 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TowerTalk] 3 element or 4 element beam (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:49:40 -0700
It is on page 11 of Force12 publication "Array of Light" on antennas. It is copyright. If I remember correctly the Orion transceiver allows the operator to set the amount of AGC which helps (?) for c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00424.html (9,326 bytes)

222. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:14:17 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "Barry" <w2up@mindspring.com> To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00076.html (9,433 bytes)

223. [TowerTalk] elevated radials vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 00:24:46 -0700
Our club is planning to use an elevated vertical for fd 40 m. I have been tasked to use EZNEC to determine length of the vertical and radials given a feedpoint 10' above ground. EZNEC reports good vs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00131.html (7,041 bytes)

224. [TowerTalk] more on elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:12:52 -0700
Thanks to everyone who responded to my posting about our clubs proposed 40m elevated radial vertical for field day. My posting was meant to obtain answers to what appears to be a modeling problem rat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00138.html (8,011 bytes)

225. Re: [TowerTalk] Circuit for SteppIR controller? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:43:14 -0700
i.e. one or two of "...these kinds of problems." out of hundreds/thousands of no-problem cable runs! k7puc I, too, was aghast when I discovered my newly purchased Orion rotator counts pulses instead
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00253.html (7,726 bytes)

226. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:01:30 -0700
or ask the SteppIR people for a control box and a power supply then make a jumper cable between the existing long cables connector to go to the two control boxes with the four ehu wires divided betwe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00256.html (9,673 bytes)

227. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax for crank-up TX-455 (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:01:01 -0700
I used a section of old, leaky garden hose bent curved to spread the weight of the coax cable. Seems to work fine with the LMR400 without sectional supports on the LM470 crankup. k7puc ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00273.html (11,125 bytes)

228. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:39:52 -0700
I can't but I can tell you the OD of the doughnut holes that I have! k7puc _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00441.html (7,270 bytes)

229. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower choices (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:23:04 -0700
Maybe I don't understand, but how can you have a rotator at the base of a crank-up tower? k7puc I have recently written a contract on a new home, 2.5-acre lot with lots of trees, and as part of the c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00654.html (9,850 bytes)

230. [TowerTalk] putting beams on tiltover crankup towers (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:26:52 -0700
Towertalkians who are leery of putting beam antennas on tilted horizontal crankups may be interested in how I installed the Steppir Monstr on my LM470 motorized crankup. I say I installed but actuall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00014.html (9,025 bytes)

231. [TowerTalk] Force 12 antennas for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:32:02 -0700
I have 5 force12 monoband antennas in new unopened boxes that I have decided to sell. EF410,EF315,EF320,EF240,EF902 all with B1 baluns 80% (?) of website price k7puc _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00186.html (6,968 bytes)

232. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vee Beam Experience? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:55:13 -0700
Interesting-I was at kl7aiz when the ham installation was setup (1950/1951). This was in a building, can't remember if it was a quonset hut, down by the water which we called "clam lagoon". During ea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00458.html (10,663 bytes)

233. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vee Beam Experience? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:08:20 -0700
All of the towertalk responses to this posting has been about rhombics, not vee beams. I had a vee beam up for several years and took it down because it wasn't all that helpful. My vee beam was 525'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00468.html (9,697 bytes)

234. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 Delivered!!! NOT!! (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:02:22 -0700
I still have 3 of my 5 Force 12 yagi beams for sale--in unopened boxes--at 80% of Force 12 website price. Immediate delivery! EF240, EF 320, & EF902 k7puc ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00629.html (7,615 bytes)

235. [TowerTalk] force 12 ef240s 40m yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:45:00 -0700
Thank you for informing about the "demise" of the EF240S. Maybe that is the reason that no one has offered to purchase my "still in the unopened box" EF240S which I never assembled because of purchas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00418.html (10,683 bytes)

236. Re: [TowerTalk] Risks on short towers (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:07:28 -0700
I have posted the following before but it is probably worth repeating. (I may hold the record for falling off short towers) Actually it was not the tower (I don't climb towers) but was the tower tilt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00727.html (10,875 bytes)

237. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank-Up Tower Base Question (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:19:57 -0800
I would hope to get a different backhoe operator that can dig more closely to 3.6'! If you can find one who has a telescoping boom he can dig to perhaps 4x4' or even closer depending on the soil type
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00031.html (9,186 bytes)

238. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank-Up Tower Base Question (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:41:01 -0800
FYI o x x x x ____ x x I I u oQ____Q The above drawing (if it remains intact) represents the typical (and lower cost) backhoe digger. The oxxxo represents the closer boom and pivots near the wheel re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00041.html (10,198 bytes)

239. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of winches... Fulton K2550 vs. K1550 (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:00:11 -0800
Yes and No. The mountings holes are close but require a slight reaming out, as I remember on only one or two of the holes. _______________________________________________ ____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00034.html (8,059 bytes)

240. Re: [TowerTalk] Bandpass Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:02:04 -0800
If one has a bandpass filter such as Dunestar or ICE and switch it in for rx and out for tx, is that good enough or is there really a filtering advantage of transmitting through the filter when nearb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00132.html (9,396 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu