- 81. Re: [TowerTalk] Funniest thing I've seen in weeks (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:41:50 -0700
- snip Why is the longer element called a reflector while the shorter element called a director> What is the origin of the naming? Basically, don't they both re-radiate because of the same reason? Wha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00704.html (8,194 bytes)
- 82. Re: [TowerTalk] Ring-Rotors (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:05:10 -0700
- Also, has anyone put a ring-rotor (swinging type) on the top of a crankup section? If so, how was it accomplished and what problems have been encountered? k7puc Greetings Has anyone ever made a "ring
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00105.html (8,408 bytes)
- 83. Re: [TowerTalk] Ring-Rotors (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 23:55:22 -0700
- correction to my original question follows" Also, has anyone put a tic type ring-rotor, or sidemount, or swinging (i.e. any method that will allow rotating two beams independently on a crankup-- wher
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00123.html (9,451 bytes)
- 84. [TowerTalk] lightning protection (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:34:19 -0700
- Maybe it would be cost effective to put up a shill tower or two i.e. a tower with nothing on it except a taller mast and a good ground. Maybe a few radials from the top of the tower to form a lightni
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00228.html (7,061 bytes)
- 85. [TowerTalk] Fulton winches (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:46:34 -0700
- I have long wondered how the brake clutch works. perhaps you could get Mike to explain its operation. Also what exactly malfunctioned? I have two Fulton winches, a k1550 which was supplied along wit
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00256.html (9,264 bytes)
- 86. [TowerTalk] Balun question(s) (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:52:17 -0700
- A fellow ham has built a "Cebik" 44' doublet for his backpacking outings but his tuner won't tune it on 40. Eznec says the feed point impedance at 20' high is 20.7 - j629.6 ohms. He has tried inserti
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00409.html (7,503 bytes)
- 87. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:48:41 -0700
- administer recommended I surely don't understand this. I am using Outlook Express and it appears that the choice of "reply" or "reply to all" is imbedded in Outlook Express software and there is no d
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00569.html (9,400 bytes)
- 88. Re: [TowerTalk] Hole Digging Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:58:56 -0700
- FT it whole _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Not necessarily. I had two tower holes 4x4x8 dug by a huge backhoe. This backhoe had a tel
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00620.html (9,133 bytes)
- 89. Re: [TowerTalk] Motorizing a TX-472 (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:47:52 -0700
- Be careful not to compare apples to oranges here. My 15 yr old tilt raising fixture for the UST 89' tower uses three pulleys for mechanical advantage. My 3 yr old LM-470 tilt raising fixture uses onl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00068.html (10,319 bytes)
- 90. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Horizontal Loops (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:14:13 -0700
- ........................................................................ .... antennas" 6 db peak??????? My first antenna after moving to my 8 acre site was to put up a long wire antenna. Using the A
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00298.html (8,945 bytes)
- 91. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Horizontal Loops (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:53:06 -0700
- True, I must have been still thinking about narrowing the the apex angle to when I used anglewidth rather than beamwidth. Anyhow, EZNEC started showing increasing gain maximizing to about 20 dbi (10
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00303.html (8,266 bytes)
- 92. Re: [TowerTalk] from W0RTT... (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:43:53 -0700
- -- Original Message -- snip electronic equipment Wow. I guess I would head for his company's beer hall. I have fond memory of an hour two viewing the horses and having pretzels while trying varieties
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00533.html (8,028 bytes)
- 93. Re: [TowerTalk] tower base concrete or not (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:06:46 -0700
- I dunno? My "intuition" sez: Then why do the manufacturers specify the hole at about twice as deep as it is wide? Do you mean sidewall area? Lateral shifting and moving--or tipping? lot. ok a pretty
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00131.html (9,564 bytes)
- 94. Re: [TowerTalk] verticals in woods vs. in a field (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:04:07 -0700
- I have done some A-B testing, informal but perhaps interesting anyway. For the past three years I have tried to get a better 160m contest antenna. Many postings have raved over an inverted L. My A an
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00318.html (12,107 bytes)
- 95. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding Feedlines (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:21:36 -0700
- it Maybe this is a "wake up" call. What is going to keep the tower owner from assuming a lightning damage is because of your equipment, no matter what you do unless he is notified and it is recorded
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00658.html (7,952 bytes)
- 96. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Tower bolts (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:18:11 -0700
- I don't know if the UST supplied bolts for the HDX572 are identical or similar to those used for the TX-472 but if they are; they are not ordinary straight bolts but rather are in the shape of a J. T
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00730.html (9,117 bytes)
- 97. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Installing Tower Bolts (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:57:34 -0700
- and would rebar. FWIW The foundation iron (Rebar/flat plate for bolting tower legs to) for the LM470 tower was furnished by the mfr. as a welded assembly. There was/is(?) no need to jiggle the each r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00015.html (9,249 bytes)
- 98. [TowerTalk] new Steppir antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:24:39 -0700
- I believe that a posting on Towertalk hinted at a new Steppir antenna. I don't have any idea as to what it might be but do Towertalkians think the following two antennas would be successfully markete
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00084.html (7,690 bytes)
- 99. [TowerTalk] Fw: new Steppir antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:09:58 -0700
- think 40 to worthwhile the _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00090.html (8,041 bytes)
- 100. [TowerTalk] 2 element 40m steppir yagi (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:51:29 -0700
- I thank those that responded to my suggestion of a possible 80 meter steppir. The difficulties that loaded (linear or coil) elements would result never occurred to me. Perhaps that was because Force1
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00110.html (8,453 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu